Skip to content

precision not well defined? #3

@gold2718

Description

@gold2718

First, why use prec instead of precision?
Second, double is not a well-defined term (neither is single). I suggest using some sort of standard (e.g., REAL64 à la ISO_FORTRAN_ENV) or by specifying the actual number of bits of precision.
Third, I do not understand the relationship between the prec property and the value of the constant. Some, such as pi, clearly are defined with more digits than can be represented by a double-precision number while others, such as standard_acceleration_of_gravity, have many fewer digits.

I guess I do not understand the intended usage of this property. Please explain.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions