Usage with Raspberry Pi #64
|
Hello, I have a very old TV. I didn't check but I would be surprised to run this on that TV. However, I have a Raspberry Pi that is just below the TV. Can I use fluxcast to send image from my computer in another room to the Raspberry Pi, and then plug HDMI cable from the Pi to the TV? I thought this was possible with Miracast, but I don't have the same feeling from fluxcast's readme. |
Replies: 1 comment 9 replies
|
Good question. Honest disclaimer! I haven't tested FluxCast against a Pi/lazycast sink, so I can't promise the handshake lines up first try. The usual sticking points between two implementations that have never met are the P2P group-owner negotiation and the video-format negotiation. But it's the right thing to try, because it's the low-latency path, and latency is the whole point of Miracast. The DLNA route (a UPnP renderer like gmrender-resurrect on the Pi + If you do try lazycast, i'd genuinely love to hear whether it works =]. That combo is uncharted for FluxCast and confirming it would help a lot of people with an old TV and a spare Pi. |
Thanks for running all that. Combined with the #548 thread, here's the honest picture.
Your iw list shows the Pi does advertise P2P (P2P-GO is listed), and the clean dmesg is only because your sink never became discoverable, so the driver never reached the step that actually fails. --wfd-scan seeing just your printer confirms the sink isn't advertising yet (the NetworkManager/wpa_supplicant holding the interface thing).
The real wall is the next step. On the same Pi 5 built-in chip, Manoj in #548 got past discovery and the driver died right at the handshake:
That's a known, wid…