Skip to content

GroupGetResult has redundant types #269

Open
@skeet70

Description

image

Seems like Option<Vec<UserId>> is just Vec<UserId> with extra steps. Is there information communicated by None that isn't communicated by [ ]? If so, we should document that. If not, we should improve the interface so you don't have to check for both None and .len() > 0 when using it.

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions