Skip to content

Slant path TEC naming convention and input data requirement #568

@huishao-r

Description

@huishao-r

Description

(1) While generating the testing files, it appear to me that the input sTEC data have multiple variables to be clarified and, if necessary, a naming convention for some of these variables should be set up. I am recording these variables using this issue.

(2) when geoval files provide integration weights, we need to make sure the weights are ready to be used, instead of being a secondary variable requiring further processing inside UFO. I noticed the original testing files I received contain path_length, which is the reference length relative to a starting point. It is not yet converted to weights.

Requirements

Require upstream code to be updated

Acceptance Criteria (Definition of Done)

UFO tests and model interface-UFO tests are properly set up with the naming convention.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions