Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
129 lines (96 loc) · 4.67 KB

File metadata and controls

129 lines (96 loc) · 4.67 KB

Security Improvements: Input Validation Implementation

Overview

This document outlines the critical security improvements made to address the lack of input validation on backend API routes in the Therapeutic AI Assistant application.

Identified Vulnerabilities

Before the improvements, the application had the following security issues:

  1. Missing Authentication API Routes: While frontend components existed for login and signup, there were no corresponding backend API routes to handle authentication requests.
  2. Potential Data Validation Gaps: Without proper backend validation, malicious actors could send malformed data to API endpoints.

Implemented Security Measures

1. Added Authentication API Routes with Input Validation

Created new API routes for authentication with comprehensive input validation:

Login Route (/api/auth/login)

  • File: src/app/api/auth/login/route.ts
  • Validation Schema: Uses the existing loginSchema from src/utils/validation/schemas.ts
  • Validates:
    • Email format (must be valid email)
    • Password length (minimum 6 characters)
  • Security Features:
    • Input validation using Zod schemas
    • Proper error handling with standardized error responses
    • Protection against malformed data

Signup Route (/api/auth/signup)

  • File: src/app/api/auth/signup/route.ts
  • Validation Schema: Uses the existing signupSchema from src/utils/validation/schemas.ts
  • Validates:
    • Email format (must be valid email)
    • Password length (minimum 6 characters)
    • Password confirmation match
  • Security Features:
    • Input validation using Zod schemas
    • Password confirmation validation
    • Proper error handling with standardized error responses

2. Enhanced Test Coverage for Security Validation

Created comprehensive tests to verify input validation works correctly:

File: src/__tests__/validation.security.test.ts

  • Tests for all validation schemas (login, signup, chat, payment, voice)
  • Tests for both valid and invalid inputs
  • Edge case testing for boundary values
  • Verification that validation correctly rejects malicious/malformed data

Existing Security Measures (Already Implemented)

The following security measures were already in place and working correctly:

Chat API Route (/api/chat)

  • File: src/app/api/chat/route.ts
  • Validation Schema: chatMessageSchema
  • Validates: Message content length (1-1000 characters)

Payment API Route (/api/payment/checkout)

  • File: src/app/api/payment/checkout/route.ts
  • Validation Schema: paymentSchema
  • Validates:
    • Plan ID (must be 'free', 'premium', or 'pro')
    • User ID (required, non-empty)

Voice API Route (/api/voice)

  • File: src/app/api/voice/route.ts
  • Validation Schema: voiceSynthesisSchema
  • Validates:
    • Text content length (1-5000 characters)
    • Voice ID (required)
    • Speed value range (0.5-2.0)

Payment Webhook Route (/api/payment/webhook)

  • File: src/app/api/payment/webhook/route.ts
  • Security Features:
    • Stripe webhook signature verification
    • Raw body buffer processing for signature verification

Validation Implementation Details

All API routes now use the same robust validation pattern:

// Validate input using Zod
const validation = validateInput(schema, body)
if (!validation.success) {
  return handleValidationError(validation.errors)
}

const { field1, field2 } = validation.data

This pattern ensures:

  1. All input is validated before processing
  2. Clear error messages are returned for invalid input
  3. Consistent error handling across all API routes
  4. Protection against injection attacks and malformed data

Error Handling

All validation errors are handled through a standardized error response system:

  • 400 Bad Request for validation errors
  • 500 Internal Server Error for unexpected issues
  • Standardized JSON error responses with consistent structure

Testing

The new validation.security.test.ts file provides comprehensive test coverage for all validation schemas, ensuring that:

  • Valid inputs are accepted
  • Invalid inputs are properly rejected
  • Edge cases are handled correctly
  • Security vulnerabilities are mitigated

Conclusion

These improvements address the critical security vulnerability of missing input validation on backend API routes. The application now has:

  1. Complete API coverage for all frontend functionality
  2. Robust input validation on all endpoints
  3. Comprehensive test coverage for security validation
  4. Standardized error handling
  5. Protection against malformed data attacks

The implementation follows the existing patterns in the codebase, ensuring consistency and maintainability.