Skip to content

Roadmap for future development of DomainSets #150

@daanhb

Description

@daanhb

Here are a few areas I'm thinking of to improve DomainSets. I'm linking to existing issues.

  1. Factor out the map code. It has no place in this package, and there is a lot of overlap with other packages. The main motivation originally for writing new code was to allow rectangular maps, which you need to map e.g. from 1D to 3D. At the time most existing packages assume that maps are invertible, square or both. (Factor out Map's #92, Don't export jacobian #87)
  2. Integrate better with existing packages that define domains, in orde to reuse them. A proof of concept using package extensions is in https://github.com/daanhb/DomainSetsExtensions.jl (package extensions and interoperability with different domain types #149)
  3. Write documentation. Even the basic syntax for primitives is not documented. The mechanism of associating domains with canonical domains is very versatile and potentially useful if it were known how to use it (Write documentation #101)
  4. Avoid type piracy. A lot has improved already, but there are some remnants of operators from Base and LinearAlgebra being overloaded simply because they look nice. This will likely take another breaking release, but it should be done. (arithmetic operations with broadcasting #148, Don't use ×? #67)
  5. Come up with a good implementation of approximate in (or approx_in), using atol and rtol arguments. It's important to get this right, since we've been so careful about distinguishing between open and closed domains as well. (use atol and rtol in approx_in #124)
  6. Implement fewer concrete domains. We've been using IntervalSets for intervals. I'm reluctant to expand the implementation of simplices and hyperfaces because other packages already do this, both better and with more focus. (Support hyperfaces #100, Should boundary(::Rectangle) use simpler types? #142)

I've been playing with a DomainSetsCore package, but I don't think it is essential to move forward so it's not on the list.

Ideally, these improvements make DomainSets smaller and yet more functional.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions