Skip to content

test ee reconstruction with EEJet type#204

Merged
graeme-a-stewart merged 1 commit intoJuliaHEP:mainfrom
m-fila:run_reco_test_jet_type
Oct 6, 2025
Merged

test ee reconstruction with EEJet type#204
graeme-a-stewart merged 1 commit intoJuliaHEP:mainfrom
m-fila:run_reco_test_jet_type

Conversation

@m-fila
Copy link
Member

@m-fila m-fila commented Sep 19, 2025

The run_reco_test function which is used to test the correctness of jet reconstruction always starts from PseudoJet input jets.
While ee algortihms can be called with PseudoJet input (which will be later converted to EEJet) it probably make more sense to test it from EEJet input from the start

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 80.22%. Comparing base (d3c97f3) to head (7bcadb6).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #204      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.00%   80.22%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        1315     1315              
==========================================
+ Hits         1052     1055       +3     
+ Misses        263      260       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@graeme-a-stewart
Copy link
Member

Thanks @m-fila - a nice little optimisation!

@graeme-a-stewart graeme-a-stewart merged commit d250e38 into JuliaHEP:main Oct 6, 2025
12 checks passed
@m-fila m-fila deleted the run_reco_test_jet_type branch October 6, 2025 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants