Skip to content

New package: Regress v0.1.0#145068

Open
JuliaRegistrator wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
registrator-regress-0ccf13ad-v0.1.0-7a0effa0cb
Open

New package: Regress v0.1.0#145068
JuliaRegistrator wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
registrator-regress-0ccf13ad-v0.1.0-7a0effa0cb

Conversation

@JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

This is the first release.

UUID: 0ccf13ad-a1f2-44b4-972b-15ef40764d74
Repo: https://github.com/gragusa/Regress.jl.git
Tree: 4b97829670b529be02b5d37841f458c2602ae92e

Registrator tree SHA: 50f504d641745716a5b3eabaf681d3a4937d2ae3
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 26, 2025

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. New package registration

Please make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines.

2. AutoMerge Guidelines are all met! ✅

Your new package registration met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged when the mandatory waiting period (3 days) has elapsed.

3. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

@gragusa
Copy link

gragusa commented Dec 26, 2025

The package name is "Similar to RegNets. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.". I do not think Regress will be confused with RegNets. [noblock]

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot added the AutoMerge: last run blocked by comment PR blocked by one or more comments lacking the string [noblock]. label Dec 26, 2025
@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot removed the AutoMerge: last run blocked by comment PR blocked by one or more comments lacking the string [noblock]. label Dec 26, 2025
@goerz
Copy link
Member

goerz commented Dec 27, 2025

This is a fork of FixedEffectModels.jl with additional features and improvements.

Could you contribute these back to FixedEffectModels? Forks of existing packages should usually not be registered, or at least not without the explicit approval of the maintainers of the original package @matthieugomez

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot added the AutoMerge: last run blocked by comment PR blocked by one or more comments lacking the string [noblock]. label Dec 27, 2025
@matthieugomez
Copy link
Contributor

Indeed — forking and diverging without attempting to contribute back to the original project feels like a missed opportunity.

@gragusa
Copy link

gragusa commented Dec 27, 2025 via email

@Arpit-Babbar
Copy link

Arpit-Babbar commented Dec 29, 2025

This started as a fork for my research. Now they have greatly diverged and trying to PR to FixedEffectsModels.jl would be impossible as not much is left of the original code (mostly the fixed effects handling). If registering is a problem I can use the package from a local repository no prob.

Another option is to use the features of FixedEffectModels.jl through Julia's package manager. The Trixi.jl community have several packages like this, e.g., https://github.com/trixi-framework/TrixiShallowWater.jl.

If you are using functions that are not a part of the API, requesting the developers to make it a part of the API will be a good idea.

@gragusa
Copy link

gragusa commented Jan 15, 2026

I cannot use the features as the package does more things using FixedEffects.jl but in a different ways.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants