Skip to content

Commit 819c905

Browse files
committed
CrofAI updated my worldview
1 parent ba77d32 commit 819c905

3 files changed

Lines changed: 76 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

src/routes/(base)/blog/+page.svelte

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
1616

1717
<div class="flex flex-wrap flex-grow gap-2 p-6">
1818
{@render blog("humanresearch", "Human Research")}
19+
{@render blog("crofai", "CrofAI updated my worldview")}
1920
{@render blog("hfconspiracies", "Hugging Face Conspiracies")}
2021
{@render blog("sdate", "Sdate is from 1993 of course")}
2122
{@render blog("tangentcomputer", "Tangent is dead; long live Tangent")}
Lines changed: 75 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
1+
<script>
2+
import BlogHeader from "$lib/BlogHeader.svelte";
3+
import bg from "./bg.avif";
4+
</script>
5+
6+
<BlogHeader {bg} title="CrofAI updated my worldview" />
7+
<p>
8+
<a href="https://ai.nahcrof.com/home">CrofAI</a> is an AI inference provider I learned about a few
9+
days ago. I used to think inference was fast OR cheap - all providers were either mid, cheap but slow
10+
or unreliable, or fast but expensive. CrofAI is both fast and cheap.
11+
</p>
12+
<p>
13+
Numbers show this best. Let's say you're using AI, specifically Kimi K2, to clone a set of
14+
calculators. Across 100 calls, you used 10K input tokens and 100K output tokens. How slow and
15+
expensive would this be on your favorite provider?
16+
</p>
17+
<table>
18+
<tbody>
19+
<tr>
20+
<th>Please consult the table</th>
21+
<th>Avg time</th>
22+
<th>Total cost (~)</th>
23+
</tr>
24+
<tr>
25+
<td>Groq (OR's fastest)</td>
26+
<td>6.32s</td>
27+
<td>$0.31</td>
28+
</tr>
29+
<tr>
30+
<td>CrofAI Turbo</td>
31+
<td>4.67s</td>
32+
<td>$0.21</td>
33+
</tr>
34+
<tr>
35+
<td>DeepInfra (OR's cheapest)</td>
36+
<td>14.99s</td>
37+
<td>$0.23</td>
38+
</tr>
39+
<tr>
40+
<td>Chutes (OR's cheapest)</td>
41+
<td>15.73s</td>
42+
<td>$0.05</td>
43+
</tr>
44+
<tr>
45+
<td>CrofAI non-turbo</td>
46+
<td>29.5s</td>
47+
<td>$0.04</td>
48+
</tr>
49+
</tbody>
50+
</table>
51+
<p>Almost certainly, your favorite provider is beat by CrofAI.</p>
52+
<p>
53+
Gemma 3n is also on CrofAI, which raises an interesting point: <em>if</em>
54+
<code>input_audio</code>
55+
blocks worked, we could transcribe at the price of
56+
<abbr title="(1/(160ms)) * ($0.03/million) + (150/minute) * ($0.05/million) in $/hour"
57+
>$0.001/hour</abbr
58+
>, dethroning <a href="/blog/humanresearch/phi-4/">Phi 4 Multimodal</a>
59+
and transcribing a whole year of audio (including night) for just $9.86. This is what "the price of
60+
intelligence [going] to zero" looks like.
61+
</p>
62+
<p>
63+
CrofAI is a story about markets in a sense. They're performing arbitrage: there are a lot of cheap
64+
3090s and 4090s out there, but nobody went to the effort of finding the cheapest ones, manually
65+
optimizing inference, and selling it as a service with a little markup. Doing this is how they
66+
become better than any other choice and prove themselves to costumers, and eventually get into
67+
OpenRouter (OR please add CrofAI thanks).
68+
</p>
69+
<p>
70+
Who's the closest to catching up to CrofAI? Arguably Chutes or another entity on Bittensor. Their
71+
prices are already decent, and if there's an incentive for making kernels faster, they could go
72+
down even more and kill CrofAI in the process. However, I doubt this is soon: Chutes moves slow,
73+
and CrofAI has already acknowledged Chutes as competition, planning even more price cuts to K2 and
74+
other models within the next week.
75+
</p>

src/routes/blog/crofai/bg.avif

731 Bytes
Binary file not shown.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)