Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
113 lines (79 loc) · 3.95 KB

File metadata and controls

113 lines (79 loc) · 3.95 KB

OpenScar Literature Seed

This is a starter map, not a formal review. Its purpose is to define the first literature buckets OpenScar should track before a scoping review or manuscript is written.

Bucket 1: Scar Imaging and Objective Assessment

Core question: how can scar appearance be captured, standardized, segmented, scored, and compared across time?

Seed topics:

  • standardized scar photography
  • before/after image comparability
  • scar color, height, pliability, and vascularity assessment
  • computer vision for scar segmentation
  • patient-reported and observer-reported scar scales
  • image quality bias in aesthetic and reconstructive outcomes

Starter search prompts:

  • scar assessment computer vision photography standardization
  • hypertrophic scar image analysis deep learning
  • keloid scar segmentation artificial intelligence
  • before after photography bias plastic surgery

Bucket 2: Keloid Recurrence Prediction

Core question: which clinical, anatomical, treatment, and follow-up variables help explain recurrence after keloid treatment?

Seed topics:

  • recurrence after surgical excision
  • adjuvant radiotherapy timing and dose
  • injection-based treatment response
  • anatomical site and tension
  • prior recurrence history
  • follow-up duration and recurrence definition
  • machine learning for keloid recurrence risk

Starter search prompts:

  • keloid recurrence prediction machine learning
  • keloid surgery radiotherapy recurrence risk factors
  • keloid treatment response prediction
  • hypertrophic scar recurrence clinical model

Bucket 3: Single-Cell and Spatial Fibrosis Biology

Core question: how can fibroblast states, immune cells, vascular niches, and extracellular matrix programs explain scar phenotype and treatment response?

Seed topics:

  • keloid single-cell RNA sequencing
  • fibroblast heterogeneity in scar and fibrosis
  • spatial transcriptomics of skin wound healing
  • myofibroblast and extracellular matrix programs
  • immune microenvironment in keloids
  • ligand-receptor interactions in scar tissue

Starter search prompts:

  • keloid single cell RNA sequencing fibroblast
  • hypertrophic scar spatial transcriptomics
  • skin wound healing single cell atlas fibrosis
  • keloid immune microenvironment fibroblast interaction

Bucket 4: Treatment Response and Longitudinal Outcomes

Core question: how should OpenScar define and measure response when patients receive multimodal and repeated treatments?

Seed topics:

  • corticosteroid injection response
  • 5-fluorouracil injection response
  • laser and energy-based scar therapy
  • silicone, pressure, and conservative care
  • surgery plus adjuvant therapy
  • multimodal treatment sequencing
  • patient-reported pain, itch, satisfaction, and function

Starter search prompts:

  • keloid corticosteroid injection response outcome
  • 5-fluorouracil keloid treatment response
  • laser treatment hypertrophic scar outcome scale
  • scar treatment patient reported outcome POSAS

Bucket 5: AI-Native Scar Registry Design

Core question: what can scar research borrow from AI-native registries, digital twin language, and longitudinal phenotype modeling without overstating clinical readiness?

Seed topics:

  • longitudinal clinical registry design
  • de-identified image registry governance
  • digital phenotype standards
  • plastic surgery outcomes databases
  • human-in-the-loop clinical AI
  • clinical decision support safety boundaries

Starter search prompts:

  • clinical image registry de-identification plastic surgery
  • longitudinal phenotype modeling clinical registry
  • human in the loop clinical AI safety
  • plastic surgery outcomes registry artificial intelligence

Review Rules

  • Track study type, cohort size, data modality, outcome definition, follow-up duration, and external validation status.
  • Separate clinical evidence from speculative model claims.
  • Do not cite a paper in public materials until the source has been checked directly.
  • Treat recurrence definitions as a major source of heterogeneity.