Summary
Documentation shows the outer columns (far-left and far-right key columns) as being lower than they are on a physical Advantage360.
Problem
info.json implies that the outer columns are at the same y alignment as the column next to it ( The keys '=', and '1', are both described as being at 0.25y).
key-positions.png should visually match the corrected geometry.
Scope
-
Update info.json:
- Raise each key in the outer columns by 0.125u (subtract 0.125 from
y for those keys).
- Ensure both left-most and right-most outer columns are adjusted.
- Keep all other keys unchanged.
-
Update key-positions.png:
- Raise the outer columns by 1/8 key (0.125u) so the diagram matches
info.json.
Motivation
I'm calculating a typing effort grid for the Advantage360 that takes into account its concavity. I planned to use the numbers from info.json as a starting point but noticed they don't match the physical keyboard.
Summary
Documentation shows the outer columns (far-left and far-right key columns) as being lower than they are on a physical Advantage360.
Problem
info.jsonimplies that the outer columns are at the same y alignment as the column next to it ( The keys '=', and '1', are both described as being at 0.25y).key-positions.pngshould visually match the corrected geometry.Scope
Update
info.json:yfor those keys).Update
key-positions.png:info.json.Motivation
I'm calculating a typing effort grid for the Advantage360 that takes into account its concavity. I planned to use the numbers from info.json as a starting point but noticed they don't match the physical keyboard.