|
| 1 | +# Request for Comments (RFC): [Title of Proposal] |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Author(s):** [Your Name(s)] |
| 4 | +**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD] |
| 5 | +**Status:** [Draft|Proposed|Accepted|Rejected] |
| 6 | +**Related RFCs:** [If applicable] |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +--- |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## 1. Summary |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +Provide a brief summary of the proposal. Explain what new command or restriction is being introduced and why. |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +## 2. Motivation |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +Describe the problem this proposal aims to solve. Include any relevant background information, current limitations, and use cases that highlight the need for this change. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +## 3. Specification |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +### 3.1 Command/Restriction Overview |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +- **Command/Restriction Name:** `[Proposed Command]` |
| 23 | +- **Syntax:** `[Command Syntax]` |
| 24 | +- **Parameters:** `[List any parameters with descriptions]` |
| 25 | +- **Example Usage:** |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | + ```plaintext |
| 28 | + [Example Command with expected behavior] |
| 29 | + ``` |
| 30 | +
|
| 31 | +### 3.2 Behavior Details |
| 32 | +
|
| 33 | +Explain how the command/restriction should behave in different scenarios, including edge cases. |
| 34 | +Consider aspects like permissions, interactions with existing commands, and possible conflicts. |
| 35 | +
|
| 36 | +## 4. Impact Analysis |
| 37 | +
|
| 38 | +### 4.1 Compatibility |
| 39 | +
|
| 40 | +- Will this change break any existing behavior? |
| 41 | +- If so, how can the transition be handled smoothly? |
| 42 | +
|
| 43 | +### 4.2 Security and Privacy Considerations |
| 44 | +
|
| 45 | +- Are there potential exploits or abuse scenarios? |
| 46 | +- Does this affect user privacy in any way? |
| 47 | +
|
| 48 | +### 4.3 Performance Considerations |
| 49 | +
|
| 50 | +- Does this introduce any performance bottlenecks? |
| 51 | +- Any expected impact on resource consumption? |
| 52 | +
|
| 53 | +## 5. Alternatives Considered |
| 54 | +
|
| 55 | +List alternative approaches that were explored and why they were not chosen. |
| 56 | +
|
| 57 | +## 6. Open Questions |
| 58 | +
|
| 59 | +List any unresolved issues or aspects requiring further discussion. |
| 60 | +
|
| 61 | +## 7. References |
| 62 | +
|
| 63 | +Include links to any relevant discussions, previous RFCs, or documentation. |
| 64 | +
|
| 65 | +--- |
| 66 | +
|
| 67 | +**(End of RFC)** |
0 commit comments