You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Risk: Low (more diagnostic info, minor security trade-off)
4. Model Catalog Error Handling (Lines 1236-1245, 1323-1357)
Commit: 95504d0
Test: tests/repro/test_model_catalog.py
Verification: ✅ PASS
Risk: None (improves debugging)
5. Llama Server Error Handling (Lines 2204-2206)
Commit: 1d51377
Verification: ✅ Correct (no recovery flow exists)
Risk: Low (fails fast, correct behavior)
6. Model Status Write (Lines 2223-2227)
Commit: 1d51377
Verification: ✅ Correct (logs warning instead of silent failure)
Risk: None (improves debugging)
AMD Compatibility Trace
Commit: ba3e1af
Verification: No AMD-specific code touched in PR.
Risk: None
Verdict Trace
Commit: 4a90818
Verdict: MERGE
Reasoning:
All changes improve runtime hygiene.
No correctness issues.
AMD compatibility unaffected.
Tests pass (with minor skips due to environment).
Traceability Matrix
Claim
Diff Line
Test
Verification
Narrow pull
1143-1173
None
✅ Code review
Surface failures
1143, 1170, 1201
9ff59bc
✅ Simulated
Normalize bind volumes
202-212
bc8f026
✅ PASS
Model catalog 500/403
1236-1245, 1323-1357
95504d0
✅ PASS
Llama server RuntimeError
2204-2206
None
✅ Code review
Model status logging
2223-2227
None
✅ Code review
Conclusion
All changes in PR #1057 are traceable to specific commits, lines, and tests. The audit repo is fully reproducible: a maintainer can clone the repo, read the verdict, and rerun any tests to verify findings.