|
83946 | 83946 | "Jinyu Li", |
83947 | 83947 | "Helen M. Meng" |
83948 | 83948 | ], |
83949 | | - "abstract": "Emotional information in speech plays a unique role in multimodal perception. However, current Speech Large Language Models (SpeechLLMs), similar to conventional speech emotion recognition (SER) systems, still treat emotion understanding as a simple classification problem. This provides limited interpretability of predictions, while leaving the LLMs’ expressive and reasoning capabilities underutilized. In this work, we take the first step to reformulate SER as a deep reasoning problem through reinforcement learning (RL). We propose EmotionThinker, which is designed to generate accurate emotion predictions with interpretable explanations grounded in fine-grained acoustic cues. To achieve this, we first construct EmotionCoT-35K, an emotional reasoning dataset with Chain-of-Thought annotations and detailed captions. Second, we observe that current SpeechLLMs exhibit weak prosody perception, whereas prosodic cues constitute fundamental signals for interpreting emotions. To address this, we develop the prosody-enhanced foundation model EmotionThinker-Base, and demonstrate that prosody enhancement improves emotion understanding. Third, we introduce Group-Relative-Policy-Optimization with Progressive-Trust-aware-Reasoning-Reward (GRPO-PTR}) for RL. Different from standard GRPO, which relies only on rule-based outcome rewards, GRPO-PTR progressively introduces reasoning reward, dynamically adjusts it with a trustworthiness weight reflecting the alignment between reasoning and outcome, and evaluates the overall reasoning quality with a reward model based on multi-dimensional criteria. EmotionThinker outperforms previous state-of-the-art evaluation models both in emotion accuracy and explanation quality, advancing SER toward interpretable multimodal reasoning.", |
| 83949 | + "abstract": "Emotional information in speech plays a unique role in multimodal perception. However, current Speech Large Language Models (SpeechLLMs), similar to conventional speech emotion recognition (SER) systems, still treat emotion understanding as a simple classification problem. This provides limited interpretability of predictions, while leaving the LLMs’ expressive and reasoning capabilities underutilized. In this work, we take the first step to reformulate SER as a deep reasoning problem through reinforcement learning (RL). We propose EmotionThinker, which is designed to generate accurate emotion predictions with interpretable explanations grounded in fine-grained acoustic cues. To achieve this, we first construct EmotionCoT-35K, an emotional reasoning dataset with Chain-of-Thought annotations and detailed captions. Second, we observe that current SpeechLLMs exhibit weak prosody perception, whereas prosodic cues constitute fundamental signals for interpreting emotions. To address this, we develop the prosody-enhanced foundation model EmotionThinker-Base, and demonstrate that prosody enhancement improves emotion understanding. Third, we introduce Group-Relative-Policy-Optimization with Progressive-Trust-aware-Reasoning-Reward (GRPO-PTR}) for RL. Different from standard GRPO, which relies only on rule-based outcome rewards, GRPO-PTR progressively introduces reasoning reward, dynamically adjusts it with a trustworthiness weight reflecting the alignment between reasoning and outcome, and evaluates the overall reasoning quality with a reward model based on multi-dimensional criteria. EmotionThinker outperforms previous state-of-the-art evaluation models both in emotion accuracy and explanation quality, advancing SER toward interpretable multimodal reasoning. Project page: https://github.com/dingdongwang/EmotionThinker", |
83950 | 83950 | "year": 2026, |
83951 | 83951 | "conference": "iclr", |
83952 | 83952 | "conferenceName": "ICLR", |
@@ -170290,7 +170290,7 @@ |
170290 | 170290 | "Tianhua Zhang", |
170291 | 170291 | "Helen M. Meng" |
170292 | 170292 | ], |
170293 | | - "abstract": "Speech inherently contains rich acoustic information that extends far beyond the textual language. In real-world spoken communication, effective interpretation often requires integrating semantic meaning (e.g., content), paralinguistic features (e.g., emotions, speed, pitch) and phonological characteristics (e.g., prosody, intonation, rhythm), which are embedded in speech. While recent multimodal Speech Large Language Models (SpeechLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in processing audio, their ability to perform fine-grained perception and complex reasoning in natural speech remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MMSU, a comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for understanding and reasoning in speech. MMSU comprises 5,000 meticulously curated audio-question-answer triplets across 47 distinct tasks. Notably, linguistic theory forms the foundation of speech language understanding (SLU), yet existing benchmarks have paid insufficient attention to this fundamental aspect and fail to capture the broader linguistic picture. To ground our benchmark in linguistic principles, we systematically incorporate a wide range of linguistic phenomena, including phonetics, prosody, rhetoric, syntactics, semantics, and paralinguistics. Through a rigorous evaluation of 22 advanced SpeechLLMs, we identify substantial room for improvement in existing models. MMSU establishes a new standard for comprehensive assessment of SLLU, providing valuable insights for developing more sophisticated human-AI speech interaction systems.", |
| 170293 | + "abstract": "Speech inherently contains rich acoustic information that extends far beyond the textual language. In real-world spoken communication, effective interpretation often requires integrating semantic meaning (e.g., content), paralinguistic features (e.g., emotions, speed, pitch) and phonological characteristics (e.g., prosody, intonation, rhythm), which are embedded in speech. While recent multimodal Speech Large Language Models (SpeechLLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in processing audio, their ability to perform fine-grained perception and complex reasoning in natural speech remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce MMSU, a comprehensive benchmark designed specifically for understanding and reasoning in speech. MMSU comprises 5,000 meticulously curated audio-question-answer triplets across 47 distinct tasks. Notably, linguistic theory forms the foundation of speech language understanding (SLU), yet existing benchmarks have paid insufficient attention to this fundamental aspect and fail to capture the broader linguistic picture. To ground our benchmark in linguistic principles, we systematically incorporate a wide range of linguistic phenomena, including phonetics, prosody, rhetoric, syntactics, semantics, and paralinguistics. Through a rigorous evaluation of 22 advanced SpeechLLMs, we identify substantial room for improvement in existing models. MMSU establishes a new standard for comprehensive assessment of SLLU, providing valuable insights for developing more sophisticated human-AI speech interaction systems. MMSU benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ddwang2000/MMSU.", |
170294 | 170294 | "year": 2026, |
170295 | 170295 | "conference": "iclr", |
170296 | 170296 | "conferenceName": "ICLR", |
@@ -170325,7 +170325,7 @@ |
170325 | 170325 | "id": "evaluation", |
170326 | 170326 | "label": "Evaluation & Benchmarks", |
170327 | 170327 | "color": "#4f46e5", |
170328 | | - "score": 9 |
| 170328 | + "score": 10 |
170329 | 170329 | }, |
170330 | 170330 | { |
170331 | 170331 | "id": "reasoning", |
@@ -190393,8 +190393,8 @@ |
190393 | 190393 | "title": "OpenEstimate: Evaluating LLMs on Reasoning Under Uncertainty with Real-World Data", |
190394 | 190394 | "authors": [ |
190395 | 190395 | "Alana Marzoev", |
190396 | | - "Jillian Ross", |
190397 | | - "Jacob Andreas" |
| 190396 | + "Jacob Andreas", |
| 190397 | + "Jillian Ross" |
190398 | 190398 | ], |
190399 | 190399 | "abstract": "Real-world settings where language models (LMs) are deployed --- in domains spanning healthcare, finance, and other forms of knowledge work --- require models to grapple with incomplete information and reason under uncertainty. Yet most LM evaluations focus on problems with well-defined answers and success criteria. This gap exists in part because natural problems involving uncertainty are difficult to construct: given that LMs have access to most of the same knowledge as humans, it is non-trivial to design questions for which LMs will struggle to produce correct answers. As a result, LM performance on reasoning under uncertainty remains poorly characterized. To address this gap, we introduce \\textsc{OpenEstimate}, an extensible, multi-domain benchmark for evaluating LMs on probabilistic estimation tasks that require models to synthesize knowledge from pretraining and express predictions as Bayesian priors. We assess these priors for accuracy and calibration. Across six frontier models, we find that LM-elicited priors are worth the equivalent of about five samples from the underlying data distribution, and that posteriors computed using LM priors tend to be more accurate than those computed using a naive prior. At the same time, the relationship between model accuracy and confidence is weak across the board, indicating the value of developing new methods to improve calibration. The \\textsc{OpenEstimate} benchmark thus offers a challenging evaluation for frontier LMs and a platform for developing models that are better at probabilistic estimation and reasoning under uncertainty.", |
190400 | 190400 | "year": 2026, |
|
0 commit comments