You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Track the current cleanup of the PEPS Fundamental Theorem part so that both the Lean proof and the blueprint exposition follow arXiv:1804.04964 faithfully.
The original concerns were:
the proof is not completed;
the TikZ diagrams do not match the paper;
some diagrams are not attached to precise mathematical steps.
realize arbitrary virtual insertions by physical operations on either neighboring endpoint, and recover a virtual insertion from two equal neighboring physical actions;
compare arbitrary matrix insertions on the chosen virtual bond and obtain the edge-blocked insertion algebra isomorphism;
obtain the bond-dimension equality and the edge gauge from the algebra isomorphism;
absorb the edge gauges into the second tensor family, producing (\widetilde B), and prove the post-absorption insertion equality eq:inj_equal_edge;
prove the scalar-reduction substep and the generalized two-injective-tensor comparison, then apply that comparison by blocking one vertex against its complement, obtaining local proportionality of the tensors;
absorb the remaining scalar freedom into the local gauges, with uniqueness understood modulo balanced edge scalars.
The normal proof should add the paper's extra blocking layer: prove the union of injective regions, build the square-lattice regions R, S, and T, block around each edge into three injective regions, then reuse the same injective-chain insertion route. The diagrams should depict these same mathematical objects and should be attached to the named theorem or definition that uses them.
Purpose
Track the current cleanup of the PEPS Fundamental Theorem part so that both the Lean proof and the blueprint exposition follow arXiv:1804.04964 faithfully.
The original concerns were:
Current structure
There are now three connected strands.
inj_isomorphsubsteps are PEPS FT: formalize virtual-to-physical realization in the three-site insertion argument #1369 and PEPS FT: formalize physical-to-virtual recovery in the three-site insertion argument #1370. Extraction of the conjugating edge gauge is PEPS FT: extract the edge gauge from the insertion algebra isomorphism #1368. Edge-gauge absorption into the modified tensor family is PEPS FT: formalize edge-gauge absorption into the modified tensor family #1363, and the post-absorption equalityeq:inj_equal_edgeis PEPS FT: formalize the post-absorption edge insertion equality #1364. The two-injective comparison is split into its scalar-reduction core PEPS FT: formalize scalar reduction in the two-injective-tensor comparison #1362 and the enclosing comparison PEPS FT: formalize the generalized two-injective-tensor comparison #1361; the final one-vertex-versus-complement step is PEPS FT: formalize the final one-vertex versus complement comparison #1360.injective_union, PEPS FT: formalize the normal PEPS edge-blocking hypotheses #1375 for the normal edge-blocking hypotheses and normal theorem statements, and Blueprint PEPS diagrams: attach the normal-section diagrams from the paper #1376 for the normal-section diagram attachments.Subissues and relevant open issues
X -> O_1,O_2insideinj_isomorph.O_1,O_2 -> Winsideinj_isomorph.eq:inj_equal_edge.inj_equal_tensors_2.inj_equal_tensors_2.gauge_unique_mod_edge_scalars(PEPS uniqueness modulo balanced edge scalars) #842 — prove uniqueness modulo balanced edge scalars.Previous issues folded in
gauge_unique_up_to_scalarafter the triangle counterexample #762 repaired the false global-scalar uniqueness statement; the remaining proof of the corrected statement is Discharge sorry ingauge_unique_mod_edge_scalars(PEPS uniqueness modulo balanced edge scalars) #842.Standard for the next work
The injective proof should follow the paper's Section 3 route:
eq:inj_equal_edge;The normal proof should add the paper's extra blocking layer: prove the union of injective regions, build the square-lattice regions
R,S, andT, block around each edge into three injective regions, then reuse the same injective-chain insertion route. The diagrams should depict these same mathematical objects and should be attached to the named theorem or definition that uses them.