test(Lux): migrate to ParallelTestRunner#1656
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @avik-pal, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request undertakes a comprehensive refactoring of the project's testing framework. The core change involves transitioning from Highlights
Changelog
Ignored Files
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a large-scale refactoring of the test suite, migrating from ReTestItems.jl to ParallelTestRunner.jl. The changes are extensive and well-executed, involving a significant restructuring of the test files into a more modular directory hierarchy, updating test definitions from @testitem to @testset, and rewriting the main test runner script. This improves the organization and maintainability of the test suite. I have one minor suggestion to update the documentation to reflect the new test groups.
Benchmark Results (Julia v1.12)Time benchmarks
Memory benchmarks
|
a92eb19 to
a0dc0a7
Compare
a0dc0a7 to
8826220
Compare
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1656 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 75.96% 2.11% -73.86%
==========================================
Files 175 163 -12
Lines 7190 7000 -190
==========================================
- Hits 5462 148 -5314
- Misses 1728 6852 +5124 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
No description provided.