Feature Area
Audit Builder Hub
Describe your proposed feature
It would be very helpful to have a dedicated optional category called “False Positive” in addition to the existing result categories such as Pass, Failed, and Manual to move selected items which are "False Positive" to these category.
What problem does this solve or what does it offer?
In some environments, compliance findings may be reported as Failed even though the requirement is already fulfilled through alternative mechanisms, for example Declarative Device Management (DDM) configurations.
Users currently have no dedicated way to mark and separate these findings from genuine failures (instead of comments).
Add an optional category named “False Positive” that allows users to:
- Identify findings that are not actual compliance issues.
- Move selected items into the False Positive category.
- Clearly distinguish them from real Failed findings.
- Include the category in reports and exports.
Feature Area
Audit Builder Hub
Describe your proposed feature
It would be very helpful to have a dedicated optional category called “False Positive” in addition to the existing result categories such as Pass, Failed, and Manual to move selected items which are "False Positive" to these category.
What problem does this solve or what does it offer?
In some environments, compliance findings may be reported as Failed even though the requirement is already fulfilled through alternative mechanisms, for example Declarative Device Management (DDM) configurations.
Users currently have no dedicated way to mark and separate these findings from genuine failures (instead of comments).
Add an optional category named “False Positive” that allows users to: