Currently we have two forks of this repository for namespaces:
As is evident from their names, there is no guidelines on how namespace repositories should be named. I would prefer to have some guidelines to keep the names systematic to make their findability easier. An advantage of optimade-stability-namespace is that it does not need much context to understand what it holds, thus even if moved away from Materials-Consortia organization it will be easy to understand what it holds. An advantage of namespace-cheminformatics is that it would look nice in alphabetical list of all namespace repositories under Materials-Consortia organization.
What neither of them has, is the mention of namespace prefix in repository name, which would be a nice property.
Pinging @rartino and @ml-evs for comments.
Currently we have two forks of this repository for namespaces:
As is evident from their names, there is no guidelines on how namespace repositories should be named. I would prefer to have some guidelines to keep the names systematic to make their findability easier. An advantage of
optimade-stability-namespaceis that it does not need much context to understand what it holds, thus even if moved away from Materials-Consortia organization it will be easy to understand what it holds. An advantage ofnamespace-cheminformaticsis that it would look nice in alphabetical list of all namespace repositories under Materials-Consortia organization.What neither of them has, is the mention of namespace prefix in repository name, which would be a nice property.
Pinging @rartino and @ml-evs for comments.