Commit 0a7dfc9
authored
feat: support predict the pitch rewards deeplink (#32266)
## **Description**
Adds the missing value in the supported values for the "campaign"
parameter in the Rewards deeplink to support predict competition.
<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->
## **Changelog**
<!-- mms-check: type=changelog required=true blocking=true -->
<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`
If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`
(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->
CHANGELOG entry: null
## **Related issues**
<!-- mms-check: type=issue-link required=true -->
Fixes: n/a
## **Manual testing steps**
<!-- mms-check: type=manual-testing required=true -->
```gherkin
Feature: my feature name
Scenario: user [verb for user action]
Given [describe expected initial app state]
When user [verb for user action]
Then [describe expected outcome]
```
## **Screenshots/Recordings**
<!-- mms-check: type=screenshot required=true -->
<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->
### **Before**
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
### **After**
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
## **Pre-merge author checklist**
<!-- mms-check: type=checklist required=true -->
<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.
Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->
- [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I've included tests if applicable
- [x] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.
#### Performance checks (if applicable)
- [ ] I've tested on Android
- Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [ ] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [ ] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example
For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).
## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**
<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->
- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Low Risk**
> Small, additive deeplink allowlist change with a test; no auth or
data-handling impact.
>
> **Overview**
> Rewards deeplinks can now use **`campaign=predict-the-pitch`**,
matching the existing pattern for campaigns like `season1` and
`perps-comp`.
>
> `handleRewardsUrl` extends the allowed `campaign` value in its types
and URL parsing so the param is stored in **`setPendingDeeplink`** and
the app navigates to Rewards instead of treating it as unknown. JSDoc
documents the new URL format, and a unit test covers the deeplink flow.
>
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
5eee52d. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->1 parent b1d54c0 commit 0a7dfc9
2 files changed
Lines changed: 15 additions & 2 deletions
File tree
- app/core/DeeplinkManager/handlers/legacy
- __tests__
Lines changed: 10 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
154 | 154 | | |
155 | 155 | | |
156 | 156 | | |
| 157 | + | |
| 158 | + | |
| 159 | + | |
| 160 | + | |
| 161 | + | |
| 162 | + | |
| 163 | + | |
| 164 | + | |
| 165 | + | |
| 166 | + | |
157 | 167 | | |
158 | 168 | | |
159 | 169 | | |
| |||
Lines changed: 5 additions & 2 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
20 | 20 | | |
21 | 21 | | |
22 | 22 | | |
23 | | - | |
| 23 | + | |
24 | 24 | | |
25 | 25 | | |
26 | 26 | | |
| |||
45 | 45 | | |
46 | 46 | | |
47 | 47 | | |
48 | | - | |
| 48 | + | |
| 49 | + | |
| 50 | + | |
49 | 51 | | |
50 | 52 | | |
51 | 53 | | |
| |||
64 | 66 | | |
65 | 67 | | |
66 | 68 | | |
| 69 | + | |
67 | 70 | | |
68 | 71 | | |
69 | 72 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments