fix: revert list item use to temp component cp-7.82.0 (#31646)

<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.

Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until this PR meets the canonical
Definition of Ready For Review in `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.

In short: the template must be materially complete (not just section
titles
present), all status checks must be currently passing, and the only
expected
follow-up commits must be reviewer-driven.
-->
<!--
mms-check directive vocabulary — read by
.github/scripts/shared/pr-template-checks.ts
at module load to build the validation plan. Directives are invisible in
rendered
markdown and must NOT be removed or edited without updating the
validator registry.

  type=text           Section must contain non-placeholder prose.
  type=changelog      Section must have a valid CHANGELOG entry: line.
type=issue-link Section must have a Fixes:/Closes:/Refs: line with a
value.
type=manual-testing Section must have real testing steps or an explicit
N/A.
type=screenshot Section must have evidence (image/URL) or an explicit
N/A.
type=checklist Section must have all checkboxes consciously checked.
required=true|false Whether a missing/invalid section runs the validator
at all.
blocking=true|false Whether a failure of this check fails the CI
workflow.
Default: false — failures are shown as warnings in the sticky
                      comment but do not block the PR.

Sections without a directive are checked for structural presence only.
-->

## **Description**

<!-- mms-check: type=text required=true -->

revert list item use to temp component

<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->

## **Changelog**

<!-- mms-check: type=changelog required=true blocking=true -->

<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`

If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`

(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->

CHANGELOG entry:null

## **Related issues**

<!-- mms-check: type=issue-link required=true -->

Fixes: https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/browse/TMCU-909

## **Manual testing steps**

<!-- mms-check: type=manual-testing required=true -->

```gherkin
Feature: my feature name

  Scenario: user [verb for user action]
    Given [describe expected initial app state]

    When user [verb for user action]
    Then [describe expected outcome]
```

## **Screenshots/Recordings**

<!-- mms-check: type=screenshot required=true -->

<img width="350" alt="Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 17 - 2026-06-12 at
09 55 38"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d2d2b77-8dd3-40e2-b038-25a7c36a8c16"
/>

### **Before**

<img width="350" alt="Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 17 - 2026-06-12 at
09 55 23"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bc086cba-0ab6-4c7d-b556-a168fdba63e7"
/>



### **After**

<img width="350" alt="Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 17 - 2026-06-12 at
09 55 38"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2d2d2b77-8dd3-40e2-b038-25a7c36a8c16"
/>



## **Pre-merge author checklist**

<!-- mms-check: type=checklist required=true -->

<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.

Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->

- [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I've included tests if applicable
- [x] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.

#### Performance checks (if applicable)

- [x] I've tested on Android
  - Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [x] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [x] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example

For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).

## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**

<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->

- [x] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [x] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.

<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---

> [!NOTE]
> **Low Risk**
> Single import swap in SettingsDrawer with no logic changes; low blast
radius UI component sourcing fix.
> 
> **Overview**
> **Settings drawer** rows stop using `ListItem` from
`@metamask/design-system-react-native` and import it again from the
component-library path (`component-library/components/List/ListItem`).
Layout and props (`style`, `gap`, children) are unchanged; only the list
row component source is swapped back for the 7.82.0 line (TMCU-909).
> 
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
e4a3183. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->

Co-authored-by: Brian August Nguyen <brianacnguyen@gmail.com>

Author: vinnyhoward

app/components/UI/SettingsDrawer/index.js

@@ -13,11 +13,11 @@ import {
   Box,
   BoxFlexDirection,
   FontWeight,
-  ListItem,
   Text,
   TextColor,
   TextVariant,
 } from '@metamask/design-system-react-native';
+import ListItem from '../../../component-library/components/List/ListItem';
 
 const createStyles = (colors) =>
   StyleSheet.create({