Commit 975cead
authored
test: removes non used dead code (#30179)
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until this PR meets the canonical
Definition of Ready For Review in `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
In short: the template must be materially complete (not just section
titles
present), all status checks must be currently passing, and the only
expected
follow-up commits must be reviewer-driven.
-->
## **Description**
#29587 added code that
is test specific oriented and isn't being used. This PR removes this
code in order to cleanup FixtureHelper.
<!--
Write a short description of the changes included in this pull request,
also include relevant motivation and context. Have in mind the following
questions:
1. What is the reason for the change?
2. What is the improvement/solution?
-->
## **Changelog**
<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`
If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`
(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->
CHANGELOG entry:
## **Related issues**
Fixes:
## **Manual testing steps**
N/A
## **Screenshots/Recordings**
<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->
### **Before**
N/A
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
### **After**
N/A
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
## **Pre-merge author checklist**
<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.
Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->
- [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I've included tests if applicable
- [x] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.
#### Performance checks (if applicable)
- [ ] I've tested on Android
- Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [ ] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [ ] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example
For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).
## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**
<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->
- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Low Risk**
> Low risk test-only cleanup: removes an unused option and associated
mock wiring, which could only affect E2E tests that implicitly relied on
the default swap popular-tokens mock.
>
> **Overview**
> Removes the unused `shouldPrefetchSwapTokens` option from
`WithFixturesOptions` and eliminates the corresponding
`FixtureHelper.withFixtures` cleanup-time hook that auto-mocked the swap
popular-tokens endpoint.
>
> E2E tests must now explicitly set up swap token mocks (e.g., via
swap-specific test mocks) rather than relying on `withFixtures` to
preconfigure them.
>
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
9918112. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->1 parent c23ca53 commit 975cead
2 files changed
Lines changed: 0 additions & 8 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
62 | 62 | | |
63 | 63 | | |
64 | 64 | | |
65 | | - | |
66 | 65 | | |
67 | 66 | | |
68 | 67 | | |
| |||
517 | 516 | | |
518 | 517 | | |
519 | 518 | | |
520 | | - | |
521 | 519 | | |
522 | 520 | | |
523 | 521 | | |
| |||
706 | 704 | | |
707 | 705 | | |
708 | 706 | | |
709 | | - | |
710 | | - | |
711 | | - | |
712 | | - | |
713 | | - | |
714 | 707 | | |
715 | 708 | | |
716 | 709 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
462 | 462 | | |
463 | 463 | | |
464 | 464 | | |
465 | | - | |
466 | 465 | | |
467 | 466 | | |
0 commit comments