Commit bc0ab56
authored
fix: stabilize useWithdrawalRequests selectors to prevent unnecessary re-renders (#29597)
## **Description**
Inline `[]` fallbacks in `useWithdrawalRequests` selectors were creating
new array references on every render, triggering React-Redux's "Selector
unknown returned a different result" warning and causing unnecessary
re-renders in `PerpsProgressBar` on mount.
Fixed by replacing inline `[]` literals with module-level constants and
short-circuiting `.filter()` on empty arrays so selectors always return
the same reference.
**Performance impact:** FPS on Perps tab mount improved from 60→22 drops
down to a stable 60→57, nearly eliminating the frame drop entirely and
it doesn't take ~1 second for the Perps screen to show anymore
**NOTE**: Unrelated to these changes, there is a considerate amount of
frame drop when you're on the Perps home screen and from the UI
hydrating. The frames drop as low as 8 FPS. This happens in `main` and
this branch as well. Might be worth a follow up ticket
## **Changelog**
CHANGELOG entry:null
## **Related issues**
Fixes:
## **Manual testing steps**
```gherkin
Feature: Perps home screen mount
Scenario: user opens the app with Perps hub tab visible
Given the hub tabs A/B test is enabled
And the user has no pending withdrawal requests
When the app loads and PerpsProgressBar mounts
Then no "Selector unknown returned a different result" warning appears in the console
And the Perps tab renders without unnecessary re-renders
And FPS remains at or above 57 during mount
```
## **Screenshots/Recordings**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/76f6b555-a949-4633-8d4c-aaffffb23f65
### **Before**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fb102b9-2dac-48c6-9b10-bbe6316825d2
### **After**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c6688dd-159c-4e9e-89ef-c298de8bc34c
## **Pre-merge author checklist**
<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.
Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->
- [x] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [x] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [x] I've included tests if applicable
- [x] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [x] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.
#### Performance checks (if applicable)
- [ ] I've tested on Android
- Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [ ] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [ ] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example
For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).
## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**
<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->
- [x] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [x] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Low Risk**
> Low risk performance-only change: replaces inline empty-array
fallbacks with stable module constants to avoid React-Redux selector
warnings and unnecessary re-renders; no business logic or API behavior
changes expected.
>
> **Overview**
> Prevents unnecessary re-renders in `useWithdrawalRequests` by
replacing inline `[]` selector fallbacks with module-level
`EMPTY_WITHDRAWAL_REQUESTS`/`EMPTY_TX_HASHES` constants and
short-circuiting the withdrawal `.filter()` when there’s no selected
address or the list is empty.
>
> This makes selector outputs stable across renders (eliminating the
“selector returned a different result” warning) while keeping the
displayed/polled withdrawal logic unchanged.
>
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
e020446. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->1 parent 8d4e444 commit bc0ab56
1 file changed
Lines changed: 8 additions & 3 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
34 | 34 | | |
35 | 35 | | |
36 | 36 | | |
| 37 | + | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
37 | 40 | | |
38 | 41 | | |
39 | 42 | | |
| |||
56 | 59 | | |
57 | 60 | | |
58 | 61 | | |
59 | | - | |
60 | | - | |
| 62 | + | |
| 63 | + | |
| 64 | + | |
| 65 | + | |
61 | 66 | | |
62 | 67 | | |
63 | 68 | | |
| |||
79 | 84 | | |
80 | 85 | | |
81 | 86 | | |
82 | | - | |
| 87 | + | |
83 | 88 | | |
84 | 89 | | |
85 | 90 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments