Commit fc4026a
chore(runway): cherry-pick fix: cp-7.78.0 add correct permissions to running perf builds (#30224)
- fix: cp-7.78.0 add correct permissions to running perf builds (#30223)
<!--
Please submit this PR as a draft initially.
Do not mark it as "Ready for review" until this PR meets the canonical
Definition of Ready For Review in `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
In short: the template must be materially complete (not just section
titles
present), all status checks must be currently passing, and the only
expected
follow-up commits must be reviewer-driven.
-->
## **Description**
> Updates the `run-performance-e2e-experimental.yml` and
`run-performance-e2e-release.yml` GitHub Actions workflows to grant
`permissions.contents: write` (instead of read-only) so they are at
least as permissive as the reusable `run-performance-e2e.yml` workflow
they call.
>
> Adds an inline comment documenting the transitive requirement (via the
BrowserStack upload workflows).
>
## **Changelog**
<!--
If this PR is not End-User-Facing and should not show up in the
CHANGELOG, you can choose to either:
1. Write `CHANGELOG entry: null`
2. Label with `no-changelog`
If this PR is End-User-Facing, please write a short User-Facing
description in the past tense like:
`CHANGELOG entry: Added a new tab for users to see their NFTs`
`CHANGELOG entry: Fixed a bug that was causing some NFTs to flicker`
(This helps the Release Engineer do their job more quickly and
accurately)
-->
CHANGELOG entry:
## **Related issues**
Fixes:
## **Manual testing steps**
```gherkin
Feature: my feature name
Scenario: user [verb for user action]
Given [describe expected initial app state]
When user [verb for user action]
Then [describe expected outcome]
```
## **Screenshots/Recordings**
<!-- If applicable, add screenshots and/or recordings to visualize the
before and after of your change. -->
### **Before**
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
### **After**
<!-- [screenshots/recordings] -->
## **Pre-merge author checklist**
<!--
Every checklist item must be consciously assessed before marking this PR
as
"Ready for review". A checked box means you deliberately considered that
responsibility, not that you literally performed every action listed.
Unchecked boxes are ambiguous: they are not an implicit "N/A" and they
are not
a silent "skip". See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md` for the full
checklist
semantics.
-->
- [ ] I've followed [MetaMask Contributor
Docs](https://github.com/MetaMask/contributor-docs) and [MetaMask Mobile
Coding
Standards](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/CODING_GUIDELINES.md).
- [ ] I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
- [ ] I've included tests if applicable
- [ ] I've documented my code using [JSDoc](https://jsdoc.app/) format
if applicable
- [ ] I've applied the right labels on the PR (see [labeling
guidelines](https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-mobile/blob/main/.github/guidelines/LABELING_GUIDELINES.md)).
Not required for external contributors.
#### Performance checks (if applicable)
- [ ] I've tested on Android
- Ideally on a mid-range device; emulator is acceptable
- [ ] I've tested with a power user scenario
- Use these [power-user
SRPs](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/edit-v2/401401446401?draftShareId=9d77e1e1-4bdc-4be1-9ebb-ccd916988d93)
to import wallets with many accounts and tokens
- [ ] I've instrumented key operations with Sentry traces for production
performance metrics
- See [`trace()`](/app/util/trace.ts) for usage and
[`addToken`](/app/components/Views/AddAsset/components/AddCustomToken/AddCustomToken.tsx#L274)
for an example
For performance guidelines and tooling, see the [Performance
Guide](https://consensyssoftware.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/TL1/pages/400085549067/Performance+Guide+for+Engineers).
## **Pre-merge reviewer checklist**
<!--
Reviewer checklist items follow the same semantics as the author
checklist: an
unchecked box is ambiguous, a checked box means the reviewer consciously
assessed that responsibility. See `docs/readme/ready-for-review.md`.
-->
- [ ] I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the
app, test code being changed).
- [ ] I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described
in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such
as recordings and or screenshots.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> **Low Risk**
> Low risk workflow-only change that broadens GitHub token permissions
to match the called reusable workflow; main risk is over-permissioning
if not actually required.
>
> **Overview**
> Updates the `run-performance-e2e-experimental.yml` and
`run-performance-e2e-release.yml` GitHub Actions workflows to grant
`permissions.contents: write` (instead of read-only) so they are at
least as permissive as the reusable `run-performance-e2e.yml` workflow
they call.
>
> Adds an inline comment documenting the transitive requirement (via the
BrowserStack upload workflows).
>
> <sup>Reviewed by [Cursor Bugbot](https://cursor.com/bugbot) for commit
54b2260. Bugbot is set up for automated
code reviews on this repo. Configure
[here](https://www.cursor.com/dashboard/bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
[8fbb9a4](8fbb9a4)
Co-authored-by: Curtis David <Curtis.David7@gmail.com>1 parent f8af913 commit fc4026a
2 files changed
Lines changed: 6 additions & 3 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
18 | 18 | | |
19 | 19 | | |
20 | 20 | | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
21 | 23 | | |
22 | | - | |
| 24 | + | |
23 | 25 | | |
24 | 26 | | |
25 | 27 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
16 | 16 | | |
17 | 17 | | |
18 | 18 | | |
19 | | - | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
20 | 21 | | |
21 | | - | |
| 22 | + | |
22 | 23 | | |
23 | 24 | | |
24 | 25 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments