Replies: 2 comments
|
The basics of a virtual interface as a data type are supported; see the "Virtual interface data type" unit test for examples. The error you posted looks like a simple parser bug, probably confused by the protected keyword prior to it. I don't remember exactly what I knew was missing; I'd have to go back through that section of the LRM and check each feature and restriction and make sure they're all implemented. |
0 replies
|
No worries on details. I just didn't want to start submitting issues for things already known to not be implemented. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I see that virtual interfaces are listed as only partially supported. Can you describe what is currently supported?
For reference, here's the errors given when declaring a virtual interface within a class:
All reactions