Never kill a living monster

[friedger]

The current contract allows to destroy a monster that is alive. We shouldn't allow that. (This might be even against the constitution :-)

[Velua]

What if you want the RAM and no longer care for that particular monster?

[friedger]

The contract says that you agreed to care for the monster until it dies. John Williamson <notifications@github.com> schrieb am Fr., 22. Juni 2018, 10:45:

…

What if you want the RAM and no longer care for that particular monster? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#29 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYcWdG0j_VO4TuhiXrnWJfjdG5_h7ohks5t_K6ZgaJpZM4UzVGl> .

[leordev]

I think it's critical in case the person does not want to be playing the game right away and needs the RAM for other dapp... We should change the Ricardian Contract and allow it (even in the ui)

[friedger]

For the story of the game it makes more sense to never kill a living monster. Now with the market you can transfer the monster. Leo Ribeiro <notifications@github.com> schrieb am So., 30. Sep. 2018, 04:03:

…

I think it's critical in case the person does not want to be playing the game right away and needs the RAM for other dapp... We should change the Ricardian Contract and allow it (even in the ui) — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#29 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYcWeke898qG22N6HPJdU74iMRPSWqXks5ugCZtgaJpZM4UzVGl> .