Bluetooth #71
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
I've been almost exclusively using bluetooth for development and testing (on the 2 instruments that support it), with 9600 baud, which is pretty standard for older instruments too. I haven't done any speed testing yet. Overall the serial profile bluetooth connection is less stable (especially as you approach the border of the range of the bluetooth modem). I haven't run into any data corruption issues, but the connection is slower to establish. Bluetooth connections also have a higher chance to fail to even initialize (probably due to the slow initial response of the instrument). If you write a bluetooth based application, you should expect to have to retry the connection at least once before signaling a failure to the user. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
With the new commands I mentioned #67 I did some testing for bluetooth speed. On the TCRP1201+ that I had access to this week, the download of a ~660KiB file took almost 3 minutes to complete. Granted, it is a pretty old total station, and seemingly it doesn't allow to change the bluetooth baud from 9600. It's not much development, but it's something. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Do you have any experience using bluetooth? I am hoping to use a higher baud rate if thats possible, Currently very slow transferring images at 115200 baud. The CS20 controller streams video albeit at much reduced resolution so I was wondering what speed the bluetooth might be able to operate on. My instinct is that a cable is faster and more reliable.
My instrument allows a baud rate of 921600 to be selected (for cable and for bluetooth) but i dont think the serial to USB converter can handle that speed. Maybe that's what I need to look at.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions