Tasks

• What's up with "NY" as expected disposition?

• Revise labels per feedback from Scott

  • dbpk: Jason: I suggest that our report output this field name rather than "mushroomObserverId"
    Yes, that would be great as it is just your MO ID.

  • sciname: Do you prefer “sciname” or Symbiota’s “scientificName”?
    As mentioned above, just the sciname and scientificNameAuthorship, as the Symbiota scientificName just joins the two.

  • fieldNotes: Should we instead use occurrenceRemarks?the value MO supplied is the MO Observation “Notes” field, which is free form. It can be field notes, or anything the user adds later (for instance microscopy measurements,
    This is similar to the answer above for field numbers - please use occurrenceRemarks for your 'notes' field - any free-form text here is good to capture as it tells more about the collection.

• Update report values #2946

• Add more fields with values #2947

• Delete unnecessary fields: Name stuff, Date stuff, Other

• Fix scientificNameAuthor for groups (delete group, clade, complex), then check for author; similar for sensu

• recordNumber: Make this blank if no collector's number
  Should this be blank unless the collector supplies a number? Should we use a different field for a collector’s number, e.g., fieldNumber For the value of this field, MO has supplied the collector’s number, or -- if there is none -- “MUOB” plus the MO id. I’m confused about exactly what the value should represent.Symbiota says: “The collection number assigned to the specimen by the collector.” This implies that there should be no number unless the collector assigns one. Darwin says: “An identifier given to the dwc:Occurrence at the time it was recorded.” This may imply that it’s something given when the Observation is recorded on MO. Sometimes our users assign a collector’s number after the Observation is created.
  I believe we created a 'MUOB 514' in the past, but this is not really necessary. We have the field number for scientific project where a field identifier is specifically generated for that project - they are more rare now days (I think your users often report this in the notes sometimes).

• Make sure Notes exporting correctly. Check it for projects, Textiled urls (see my obss with nearby trees), etc. Ex: Textile link https://www.mycoportal.org/portal/api/v2/occurrence/8187446.

• Add newlines to Notes if that's what we currently do.

• Add something about sequences to occurrenceRemarks.

• Change order of fields.
  Should be same as https://www.mycoportal.org/portal/api/v2/occurrence/search?catalogNumber=MUOB%20514&limit=100&offset=0

• Ensure app/controllers/observations/downloads_controller.rb line 76 is covered (raise("Invalid download type: #{format.inspect}"))

• Manual test

• Rubocop

• PR