You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How should I avoid creating ITM INFO subrecords while keeping keeping entries in the INFOM and INFOA fields of the parent DIAL record correctly aligned?
Adding all of the INFO subrecords for a DIAL record to the patch preserves the alignment of INFOM/INFOA but creates ITMs I'd prefer to avoid. On the other hand, only adding the subrecords that are actually modified does not create ITMs but misaligns the INFOM/INFOA fields.
Or is there no benefit to aligning the INFOA/INFOM fields?
I'm quite new to Mutagen, so any feedback would be appreciated.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
How should I avoid creating ITM INFO subrecords while keeping keeping entries in the INFOM and INFOA fields of the parent DIAL record correctly aligned?
Adding all of the INFO subrecords for a DIAL record to the patch preserves the alignment of INFOM/INFOA but creates ITMs I'd prefer to avoid. On the other hand, only adding the subrecords that are actually modified does not create ITMs but misaligns the INFOM/INFOA fields.
Or is there no benefit to aligning the INFOA/INFOM fields?
I'm quite new to Mutagen, so any feedback would be appreciated.
Below is an example.

Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions