moved data ethics section up in lesson

Author: NicoleMGreco

materials/sections/metadata-adc-data-documentation-hands-on.qmd

@@ -757,31 +757,6 @@ fig-align="center"}](https://datascience.codata.org/articles/10.5334/dsj-2020-04
     [guidelines](https://arcticdata.io/data-ethics/) on how to write and
     what to include in an Ethical Research Practices Statement.
 
-## Exercise: Evaluate a Data Package on the ADC Repository
-
-Explore data packages published on the ADC assess the quality of their
-metadata. Imagine you're a data curator!
-
-::: callout-tip
-### Setup
-
-1.  Break into groups and use the following data packages:
-    a.  **Group A:** ADC Data Portal [White spruce (Picea glauca)
-        densities at Brooks Range treelines, Alaska
-        (2019-2022)](https://doi.org/10.18739/A2Q52FF49)
-    b.  **Group B:** ADC Data Portal [A 2022 household survey about
-        impacts and human response to climate-related multi-hazards in
-        Anchorage, Fairbanks, and
-        Whitehorse](https://doi.org/10.18739/A23R0PV62)
-    c.  **Group C:** ADC Data Portal [Summertime water quality
-        measurements at beaver ponds and associated locations in Arctic
-        Alaska, 2022-2026](https://doi.org/10.18739/A2P55DJ42)
-:::
-
-You and your group will evaluate a data package for its: (1) metadata
-quality, (2) data documentation quality for reproducibility, and (3)
-FAIRness and CAREness.
-
 ## Research Data Publishing Ethics
 
 For over 20 years, the [Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)](https://publicationethics.org/) has provided trusted guidance on ethical practices for scholarly publishing.
@@ -823,6 +798,31 @@ The group has also published templates for use by publishers and repositories to
 
 ![Force11/COPE](images/force11-cope-logos.png)
 
+## Exercise: Evaluate a Data Package on the ADC Repository
+
+Explore data packages published on the ADC assess the quality of their
+metadata. Imagine you're a data curator!
+
+::: callout-tip
+### Setup
+
+1.  Break into groups and use the following data packages:
+    a.  **Group A:** ADC Data Portal [White spruce (Picea glauca)
+        densities at Brooks Range treelines, Alaska
+        (2019-2022)](https://doi.org/10.18739/A2Q52FF49)
+    b.  **Group B:** ADC Data Portal [A 2022 household survey about
+        impacts and human response to climate-related multi-hazards in
+        Anchorage, Fairbanks, and
+        Whitehorse](https://doi.org/10.18739/A23R0PV62)
+    c.  **Group C:** ADC Data Portal [Summertime water quality
+        measurements at beaver ponds and associated locations in Arctic
+        Alaska, 2022-2026](https://doi.org/10.18739/A2P55DJ42)
+:::
+
+You and your group will evaluate a data package for its: (1) metadata
+quality, (2) data documentation quality for reproducibility, and (3)
+FAIRness and CAREness.
+
 ::: callout-note
 ### Exercise: Evaluate a data package on the ADC Data Portal