You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the idea. This feature requires developing a pretty major geometry processing toolkit, and is not currently on the roadmap. I will tag this as a feature request for the future.
What is your use case, requiring this? (booleans over surface meshes are also not well-defined in the case of non-manifold or non-closed geometry, a problem closely studied in 3D printing. E.g. here's one example of toolkit supporting implicit surface modeling with these operations supported, but not differentiable: https://www.gradientspace.com/tutorials/2018/2/20/implicit-surface-modeling)
Activity
shumash commentedon Feb 23, 2025
Thanks for the idea. This feature requires developing a pretty major geometry processing toolkit, and is not currently on the roadmap. I will tag this as a feature request for the future.
What is your use case, requiring this? (booleans over surface meshes are also not well-defined in the case of non-manifold or non-closed geometry, a problem closely studied in 3D printing. E.g. here's one example of toolkit supporting implicit surface modeling with these operations supported, but not differentiable: https://www.gradientspace.com/tutorials/2018/2/20/implicit-surface-modeling)