Skip to content

The term "realisation" is ambiguous #7254

Open
@fricklerhandwerk

Description

Problem

Historically, that term was "realise" or the process of "realisation". @edolstra noted that "realisation" is overloaded, as it is used in the context of content-addressed derivations to denote what according to @thufschmitt we could rather call "realisation witness": a triplet (derivation hash, store path, output name).

Checklist

Proposal

realisation -> realisation witness

Although that is a clumsy name, maybe someone can come up with something more snappy.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions