[FIX] dms: allow unarchiving DMS files for non-superusers

The _check_access_dms_record method uses self.search(domain) to verify
write permissions. However, search() applies active_test=True by default,
which excludes archived records (active=False).

This means when a user tries to unarchive a file via toggle_active(),
the write permission check cannot find the archived record in the search
results, causing an AccessError even when the user has full write
permissions through DMS access groups.

Fix: add active_test=False context to include archived records in the
permission check search.

Author: shagab99

dms/models/dms_security_mixin.py

@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ def _check_access_dms_record(self, operation: str) -> tuple | None:
         if any(self._ids) and not self.env.su:
             Rule = self.env["ir.rule"]
             domain = Rule._compute_domain(self._name, operation)
-            items = self.search(domain)
+            items = self.with_context(active_test=False).search(domain)
             if any(x_id not in items.ids for x_id in self.ids):
                 raise Rule._make_access_error(operation, (self - items))