[BUG] Incorrect labeling of phases for completed thermochimica calculations

[AndrewKitterman]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

After running thermochimica for a system, I realized the phase labels are incorrect. For example, in the screenshot I have attached, FCCN and FCCN#3 are present along with sigma and sigma#5.

Expected Behavior

The phase labels should be sequential (like FCCN#1) instead of jumping to a further number.

Steps To Reproduce

Run thermochimica on this input file:

statespace.csv

review the list of phases present in the .json output file.

Environment

- OS:
- Compiler:
- Python:
- Branch:
- Commit Hash:

Anything else?

I can also provide the python code used to generate the screenshot. However, it only dumps the .json and does not modify the data present.

[aidanfitz]

Is it possible that you can share the data file that you are using?

The problem could be within the data file. When we have miscibility gaps in data, often the data file will label Model#1 or Model#2. in this case you may just have out of order labels in the data file like FCCN, FCCN#2, FCCN#4
This can happen with manual edits of the data.

Check the data file for such values and look to see if they are labeled as shown in your output.