|
| 1 | +# Section [NN]: [Topic Title] - Research Report |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Topic ID:** [Must match overall research plan index, e.g., IDR-SRV-001] |
| 4 | +**Report Status:** [Draft | In Review | Final] |
| 5 | +**Research Plan:** [Relative or absolute link to topic research plan] |
| 6 | +**Overall Research Plan:** [Relative or absolute link to controlling overall research plan] |
| 7 | +**Research Questions Covered:** [Count and short scope statement] |
| 8 | +**Methodology Used:** [Short summary of how research was performed] |
| 9 | +**Research Time:** [Actual time spent and date range] |
| 10 | +**Primary Source(s):** |
| 11 | +- [Authoritative source URL/path] |
| 12 | +- [Authoritative source URL/path] |
| 13 | +**Supporting Resources:** |
| 14 | +- [Related report or plan] |
| 15 | +- [Related report or plan] |
| 16 | +**Document Purpose:** [What decision(s) this report enables] |
| 17 | +**Author(s):** [Name/Team] |
| 18 | +**Date:** [Month Day, Year] |
| 19 | +**Last Updated:** [Month Day, Year] |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +--- |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +## Usage Rules |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +This report template is for topic-level reports that must correlate to governance topic plans. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +1. `Topic ID` must exactly match the ID in the overall research plan index. |
| 28 | +2. `Research Plan` must link to the corresponding topic-specific research plan. |
| 29 | +3. Every conclusion must be backed by explicit evidence and references. |
| 30 | +4. Recommendations must be decision-usable, not descriptive only. |
| 31 | +5. Report is final only when all core questions from the topic plan are addressed or explicitly marked unresolved. |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +--- |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +## Table of Contents |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +1. Executive Summary |
| 38 | +2. Scope and Plan Alignment |
| 39 | +3. Evidence Base |
| 40 | +4. Findings by Research Question |
| 41 | +5. Decision Analysis |
| 42 | +6. Key Recommendations |
| 43 | +7. Implementation Implications and Estimates |
| 44 | +8. Risks, Constraints, and Open Questions |
| 45 | +9. Validation Against Plan Success Criteria |
| 46 | +10. Next Steps and Handoff |
| 47 | +11. References |
| 48 | +12. Appendices (Optional) |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +--- |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +## 1. Executive Summary |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | +Provide a concise, decision-oriented summary. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +- Problem or decision context |
| 57 | +- Most important findings |
| 58 | +- Final recommendation |
| 59 | +- Notable unresolved risk (if any) |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +--- |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +## 2. Scope and Plan Alignment |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +Show explicit correlation to governance planning artifacts. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +- Topic ID and title confirmation |
| 68 | +- Topic plan objective coverage statement |
| 69 | +- In-scope items completed |
| 70 | +- Out-of-scope items (if any) |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +### Research Question Coverage Matrix |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +| Plan Question ID | Question (Short Form) | Coverage Status | Evidence Location | |
| 75 | +|---|---|---|---| |
| 76 | +| [Q1] | [Question summary] | [Complete/Partial/Unresolved] | [Section/appendix/reference] | |
| 77 | +| [Q2] | [Question summary] | [Complete/Partial/Unresolved] | [Section/appendix/reference] | |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +--- |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +## 3. Evidence Base |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +Document the evidence used and how it was validated. |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +### 3.1 Primary Sources Reviewed |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +| Source | Type | Why It Is Authoritative | Access Date | Notes | |
| 88 | +|---|---|---|---|---| |
| 89 | +| [URL/path] | [Spec/code/repo/etc.] | [Justification] | [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Note] | |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | +### 3.2 Supporting Sources Reviewed |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +| Source | Relevance | Access Date | Notes | |
| 94 | +|---|---|---|---| |
| 95 | +| [URL/path] | [How used] | [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Note] | |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +### 3.3 Evidence Quality Notes |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +- [Any caveat, data limitation, missing source, or confidence note] |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +--- |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +## 4. Findings by Research Question |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +Report findings grouped by topic-plan questions, not by ad hoc narrative. |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +### 4.1 [Question ID/Theme] |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +**Finding:** [Clear statement] |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +**Evidence:** |
| 112 | +- [Direct source citation with specific section/path] |
| 113 | +- [Direct source citation with specific section/path] |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +**Interpretation:** [What the evidence means for this topic] |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +### 4.2 [Question ID/Theme] |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +**Finding:** [Clear statement] |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +**Evidence:** |
| 122 | +- [Direct source citation] |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +**Interpretation:** [Decision-relevant meaning] |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | +--- |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | +## 5. Decision Analysis |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +Evaluate viable options and trade-offs before final recommendation. |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +| Option | Benefits | Costs/Risks | Standards/Compatibility Impact | Recommendation | |
| 133 | +|---|---|---|---|---| |
| 134 | +| [Option A] | [Benefit] | [Cost/risk] | [Impact] | [Keep/Reject/Conditional] | |
| 135 | +| [Option B] | [Benefit] | [Cost/risk] | [Impact] | [Keep/Reject/Conditional] | |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +--- |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +## 6. Key Recommendations |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | +Provide explicit, bounded, actionable recommendations. |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | +1. [Recommendation statement] |
| 144 | + - Rationale: [Short rationale] |
| 145 | + - Preconditions: [If any] |
| 146 | + - Priority: [High/Medium/Low] |
| 147 | +2. [Recommendation statement] |
| 148 | + - Rationale: [Short rationale] |
| 149 | + - Preconditions: [If any] |
| 150 | + - Priority: [High/Medium/Low] |
| 151 | + |
| 152 | +--- |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +## 7. Implementation Implications and Estimates |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | +Capture practical downstream impact for planning artifacts. |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +### 7.1 Implications |
| 159 | + |
| 160 | +- [Architecture implication] |
| 161 | +- [Implementation implication] |
| 162 | +- [Testing or validation implication] |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | +### 7.2 Effort/Complexity Estimate |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +| Work Item | Relative Complexity | Estimate | Assumptions | |
| 167 | +|---|---|---|---| |
| 168 | +| [Item] | [Low/Medium/High] | [Time/points] | [Assumptions] | |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +--- |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | +## 8. Risks, Constraints, and Open Questions |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +### 8.1 Risks and Constraints |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +- [Risk/constraint] |
| 177 | +- [Risk/constraint] |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +### 8.2 Open Questions |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +- [Open question and why unresolved] |
| 182 | +- [Open question and next action] |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +--- |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +## 9. Validation Against Plan Success Criteria |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +Map report outcomes back to the topic plan success criteria. |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +| Topic Plan Success Criterion | Validation Status | Evidence | |
| 191 | +|---|---|---| |
| 192 | +| [Criterion] | [Met/Partially Met/Not Met] | [Section/reference] | |
| 193 | +| [Criterion] | [Met/Partially Met/Not Met] | [Section/reference] | |
| 194 | + |
| 195 | +--- |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | +## 10. Next Steps and Handoff |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | +Define immediate follow-on work and ownership. |
| 200 | + |
| 201 | +1. [Next action] - Owner: [Name/Team] - Due: [YYYY-MM-DD] |
| 202 | +2. [Next action] - Owner: [Name/Team] - Due: [YYYY-MM-DD] |
| 203 | + |
| 204 | +--- |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | +## 11. References |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | +List all cited sources with reproducible links. |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +- [Full URL or repository path] |
| 211 | +- [Full URL or repository path] |
| 212 | +- [Full URL or repository path] |
| 213 | + |
| 214 | +--- |
| 215 | + |
| 216 | +## 12. Appendices (Optional) |
| 217 | + |
| 218 | +Include supporting detail that would otherwise disrupt report readability. |
| 219 | + |
| 220 | +- Raw extraction tables |
| 221 | +- Command logs |
| 222 | +- Comparison matrices |
| 223 | +- Supplemental examples |
| 224 | + |
| 225 | +--- |
| 226 | + |
| 227 | +## Report Completion Checklist |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | +- [ ] Topic ID matches overall research plan index |
| 230 | +- [ ] Topic research plan is linked and aligned |
| 231 | +- [ ] Core research questions are covered or explicitly unresolved |
| 232 | +- [ ] Findings are evidence-backed with reproducible references |
| 233 | +- [ ] Recommendations are explicit and actionable |
| 234 | +- [ ] Risks and open questions are documented |
| 235 | +- [ ] Success criteria validation is complete |
| 236 | +- [ ] Next steps are assigned |
0 commit comments