Skip to content

openjd_status vs openjd_fail #89

@crowecawcaw

Description

@crowecawcaw

Description

There are two STDOUT messages that could be used for conveying the status of a failed action: openjd_status and openjd_fail. As best as I can tell, openjd_fail does not actually report that a job failed, it's just a description string that an OJD system can use to give users more detail on a failure. If that's the case, it seems redundant with openjd_status which also reports a helpful description of the current action.

Am I correctly understanding how these two message types work? It'd be helpful for the spec to clarify if openjd_fail formally reports the action as a failure or not. If the two messages do overlap, it'd be helpful to clarify that. Or remove openjd_fail if it's extraneous.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions