Skip to content

Little difference for radiation damage or without it (2NIP, PMI + singFEL) #199

@rshopa

Description

@rshopa

Greetings,

As far as I understood, radiation damage for SPI could be adjusted in parameters of XMDYNDemoPhotonMatterInteractor() and SingFELPhotonDiffractorParameters(), namely random_rotation, uniform_rotation, calculate_Compton.

I checked these options and found out that random_rotation deteriorates the image quite significantly. But I still cannot reproduce the difference (without and with radiation damage) as shown in earlier work (C Fortmann–Grote et al., Proceedings of SPIE (2017), in Figure 5), for the sample is the 2NIP protein.

Here's how it looks like in notebook for two cases:
image
image

The resulting images (for poissonize=False) are much more alike than shown in the article:
image

So, what did I miss? Maybe multiple diffraction patterns? Another parameters set in properties?

I also tried to comment/remove lines (e.g. calculate_Compton=False) and tested this on other proteins (5UDC, 3F70, 2I0J etc) and did not observe the difference.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions