Skip to content

fix: ERROR FIX eslint IN REFRESHTOKEN #3914

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

sohelhussain
Copy link

@sohelhussain sohelhussain commented Apr 3, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Upgrade package eslint-plugin-tsdoc from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0

Issue Number:

Fixes #3911

Summary

The Talawa-Admin setup has multiple issues, including outdated dependencies (e.g., [email protected], [email protected]), peer conflicts ([email protected] vs [email protected]), and security vulnerabilities (14 reported by npm audit). ESLint errors include missing return types, unused variables, and incorrect TSDoc syntax. Prettier issues involve missing commas and blank lines. To fix this, upgrade dependencies, resolve peer conflicts, run npm audit fix, apply prettier and eslint --fix, and validate TSDoc comments.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Refined accordion styling with enhanced transition effects, including smoother border-radius and shadow details.
    • Improved font styling layout for clearer visual design.
  • Chores
    • Upgraded and streamlined various dependencies to boost overall system stability and performance.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted PDF generation handling for more consistent file output.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request refines the code base through various improvements. The CSS files have been reformatted for improved readability and styling, including adjustments to font-family declarations and accordion transitions. The dependency management in package.json has been updated with removals, updates, and additions to various packages. Additionally, the Blob construction in a React component has been enhanced for better binary data handling, and a test file has been modified for a more robust window.location setup.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/src/css/custom.css, src/assets/css/app.css Reformatted CSS variable declarations: improved readability for font-family variables and updated accordion transition effects.
package.json Removed outdated dependencies and updated/added several packages, including upgrading eslint-plugin-tsdoc to 0.4.0.
src/components/CheckIn/TableRow.tsx Modified Blob creation by wrapping pdf.buffer in a Uint8Array to enhance binary data handling.
src/utils/getRefreshToken.spec.ts Updated window.location definition using Object.defineProperty with a writable attribute for improved test reliability.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (Linked Issue) Addressed Explanation
Upgrade eslint-plugin-tsdoc from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0 (#3911)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

test, ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

I'm a rabbit, hopping with glee,
In CSS and code, I dance so free.
Dependencies updated with a cheerful beat,
Blob tweaks and tests make my day complete.
I nibble on code, playful and spry—
Celebrating these changes as I hop by!

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0a7f73c and 293d017.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • docs/src/css/custom.css (1 hunks)
  • package.json (4 hunks)
  • src/assets/css/app.css (4 hunks)
  • src/components/CheckIn/TableRow.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/utils/getRefreshToken.spec.ts (1 hunks)
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (1)
  • src/assets/css/app.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: PR Workflow
src/components/CheckIn/TableRow.tsx

[error] 1-1: File contains code coverage disable statement. Please remove it and add the appropriate tests.

package.json

[error] 1-1: Unauthorized change/delete detected for file 'package.json'.

🔇 Additional comments (6)
docs/src/css/custom.css (1)

42-48: Improved CSS variable formatting for better readability.

The multiline formatting of font family declarations makes the CSS more readable while maintaining the same functionality.

src/utils/getRefreshToken.spec.ts (1)

34-37: Improved window.location mock implementation.

Using Object.defineProperty with writable: true is a better approach than direct assignment for mocking the location object in tests. This ensures the property can be properly modified during tests while maintaining its attributes.

package.json (4)

118-120: New TSDoc-related dependencies added.

The addition of @microsoft/tsdoc and @microsoft/tsdoc-config dependencies supports the eslint-plugin-tsdoc upgrade mentioned in the PR objectives.

The new @testing-library/dom package will enhance DOM testing capabilities.


140-141: Updated testing dependencies.

The vitest coverage package has been updated to version 3.1.1, which should be compatible with the main vitest version also being updated.


149-150: Upgraded eslint-plugin-tsdoc to v0.4.0.

This is the primary objective of the PR and should help resolve TSDoc syntax issues.


160-164:

❓ Verification inconclusive

New documentation packages and updated Vitest.

The TypeDoc packages will enhance documentation generation capabilities, and Vitest has been updated to version 3.1.1.


🌐 Web query:

What are the breaking changes between Vitest 2.x and 3.x?

💡 Result:

Vitest 3.x introduced several breaking changes from 2.x that developers should be aware of:

Configuration Changes

  • Browser configuration: browser.name and browser.providerOptions were deprecated. Use browser.instances to define multiple browser setups in a single configuration [4][10].
  • Coverage: Test files are now always excluded from coverage reports, even if coverage.excludes is overwritten [4].
  • Vite 6 integration: The module conditional export is no longer resolved by default due to Vite 6 changes [4][3].

API and Behavior Changes

  • Mock behavior:
    • spy.mockReset() now restores the original implementation instead of a no-op [4].
    • vi.spyOn() reuses existing mocks rather than creating new ones [4].
  • Test declarations: Passing an object as the third argument to test/describe triggers warnings (will throw errors in v4):
    test('test', { retry: 3 }, () => {...}) // Warning ✅
    test('test', () => {...}, { retry: 3 }) // Warning ❌
  • Error comparisons: Stricter checks now include name, message, cause, and prototype comparisons:
    expect(new TypeError('msg')).toEqual(new Error('msg')) // Fails ✅

Type System Changes

  • Deprecated types: The Custom type was deprecated. Use RunnerCustomCase and RunnerTestCase instead [4].
  • ImportMetaEnv: Made strictly unavailable in config files unless explicitly defined [3][8].

Environment Requirements

  • Node.js: Requires Node 18+ when using browser mode with updated environment packages [3][9].
  • Vite 6: Some resolver behaviors changed - test files using module conditionals may need adjustments [4].

Developers should consult the official migration guide for detailed upgrade instructions and validation steps [4][10]. While most projects won't be affected, teams using advanced mocking or custom reporters should pay special attention to API changes.

Citations:


Action: Verify Vitest 3.x Breaking Changes and Test Configurations

The updated package.json now includes new documentation packages ("typedoc" and "typedoc-plugin-markdown") and updates Vitest to version 3.1.1. Note that Vitest 3.x introduces several breaking changes versus 2.x—such as adjustments in configuration (e.g., browser settings and coverage exclusions), modifications to mock behavior, and stricter error comparisons. Please ensure that:

  • Test Configurations: All test setups (including any browser or coverage configurations) are compatible with Vitest 3.x.
  • Mock & API Changes: Any custom mocks and test behaviors are reviewed in light of the updated API changes.
  • Migration Verification: The official Vitest migration guide is consulted to address potential impacts on your test suite.

If your test suite passes and these points have been validated, the new dependency updates appear safe to merge.

Comment on lines +76 to +77
const blob = new Blob([new Uint8Array(pdf.buffer)], {
type: 'application/pdf',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Enhanced Blob construction with explicit Uint8Array.

Wrapping the buffer in a Uint8Array before creating the Blob improves type safety and compatibility when handling binary data.

However, there's a code coverage disable statement (istanbul ignore next) that should be removed according to the pipeline error. You should add appropriate tests instead of disabling code coverage.

Comment on lines +67 to +69
"vite": "^6.2.4",
"vite-plugin-environment": "^1.1.3",
"vite-plugin-node-polyfills": "^0.22.0",
"vite-plugin-node-polyfills": "^0.23.0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Package updates for Vite and related plugins.

The updates to Vite (to v6.2.4) and vite-plugin-node-polyfills are significant version jumps that might introduce breaking changes.

There's a pipeline error indicating unauthorized changes to package.json. Please make sure these updates are properly approved and follow the project's dependency management policies.

#!/bin/bash
# Checking Vite v6 compatibility with current setup
grep -r "import.meta" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" .

Comment on lines +155 to 156
"jest-preview": "^0.2.3",
"lint-staged": "^15.3.0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Downgraded jest-preview.

The change from version 0.3.1 to 0.2.3 appears to be a downgrade rather than an upgrade.

Verify if this downgrade is intentional and necessary for compatibility with other packages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

NoMongo: Upgrade package eslint-plugin-tsdoc from 0.3.0 to 0.4.0
1 participant