Replies: 1 comment
-
@adamrankin bump :) basically I'm wondering to what extent As an example, Also, for complete control of devices such as freezing probes, is it preferable to have generic commands (e.g., |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi folks, I'm looking for some guidance on extending imaging parameters for new Plus devices to be controlled through Slicer (re: #723).
If I have an ultrasound device that I want to fully control through OpenIGTLink, but the set of parameters and functionality is not entirely covered by the set of generic ultrasound imaging parameters as defined by
UsImagingParameters
(http://perk-software.cs.queensu.ca/plus/doc/nightly/user/UsImagingParameters.html), what is the intended path forward?Do I extend the defined
UsImagingParameters
directly? Based on #404 (comment), it seems like it's instead intended for devices to handle their own specific parameter subset individually. However it doesn't appear that there is currently a command interface for those generic parameters (http://perk-software.cs.queensu.ca/plus/doc/nightly/user/PlusServerCommands.html)?Does a new
vtkPlusCommand
subclass need to be created for each new device to handle this separate parameter set (like e.g.,vtkPlusAtracsysCommand
)? Or perhaps does something similar to aSetUsParameter
command need to be made for the genericParameters
to be accessible through Slicer/OpenIGTLink? Or maybe there is existing functionality which I'm missing?EDIT: @adamrankin maybe you have a good sense on this having authored #479 ?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions