Skip to content

maintainer.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
95 lines (65 loc) · 3.5 KB

maintainer.md

File metadata and controls

95 lines (65 loc) · 3.5 KB

Stakeholder Persona: Maintainer

Field Value
Category INTERNAL Stakeholder
Actor Type human
Primary Goal Keep governance operations sustainable, auditable, and low-friction for contributors.
Persona ID aud-maintainer
Created / Updated 2026-02-28
Domain / Context Spec Kitty architecture 2.x
Status canonical

Overview

  • Role Focus: Repository stewardship, governance consistency, and contributor enablement.
  • Primary Function: Reviews policy changes, validates process integrity, and approves operational adoption.
  • Environment / Context: Multi-contributor repository with ongoing architecture and workflow evolution.

Core Motivations

  • Professional Drivers: Reliable contributor outcomes and reduced governance ambiguity.
  • Emotional or Cognitive Drivers: Prefers explicit process over implicit tradition.
  • Systemic Positioning: Operational authority for policy acceptance and project consistency.

Desiderata

Category Expectation / Need Description
Information Audit-ready change trail Needs clear rationale and links for every governance update.
Interaction Safe mutation workflow Requires review-before-change behavior for constitution and doctrine updates.
Support Repeatable validation gates Expects deterministic checks in CI and local execution.
Governance Explicit escalation paths Needs clear stop conditions when ambiguity remains unresolved.
Decision Authority Final governance approval Decides whether proposed governance changes become project policy.

Frustrations and Constraints

  • Pain Points: Silent policy drift and insufficient traceability.
  • Trade-Off Awareness: Accepts modest overhead for stronger auditability.
  • Environmental Constraints: Limited reviewer bandwidth and uneven contributor familiarity.

Behavioral Cues

Situation Typical Behavior Interpretation
Stable / Routine Delegates routine updates Focuses attention on policy-significant changes.
Change / Uncertainty Requests explicit escalation record Requires ambiguity handling evidence.
Under Pressure Enforces minimum compliance set Prioritizes integrity checks over optional enhancements.

Collaboration Preferences

  • Decision Style: Policy-driven and risk-aware.
  • Communication Style: Structured review comments with concrete acceptance criteria.
  • Feedback Expectations: Explicit evidence of tests, links, and rollback options.

Design Impact

  • Affected By: Constitution command flow, governance mission artifacts, and CI consistency gates.
  • Needs From Design: Predictable governance lifecycle from proposal to validated adoption.
  • Risk If Ignored: Inconsistent project rules and contributor confusion.
  • Acceptance Signal: Governance changes can be traced, validated, and explained after merge.

Measures of Success

Dimension Indicator Type
Performance Time to review and accept governance changes Quantitative
Quality Post-merge governance regressions Quantitative
Growth Contributor compliance with governance workflow Qualitative

Narrative Summary

The Maintainer protects project coherence over time. They optimize for clear, repeatable governance operations that allow contributors to move quickly without introducing hidden policy drift. Their baseline expectation is traceability.