You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: inputs/manual_input.csv
+11-11
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -39,16 +39,16 @@ CH4 (g) pipeline,electricity-input,2020,0.01,MW_e/1000km/MW_CH4,2015,"Danish Ene
39
39
CH4 (g) fill compressor station,investment,2040,1654.96,EUR/MW_CH4,2020,"Guesstimate, based on H2 (g) pipeline and fill compressor station cost.","Assume same ratio as between H2 (g) pipeline and fill compressor station, i.e. 1:19 , due to a lack of reliable numbers."
40
40
CH4 (g) fill compressor station,lifetime,2040,20,years,2020,Assume same as for H2 (g) fill compressor station.,-
41
41
CH4 (g) fill compressor station,FOM,2040,1.7,%/year,2020,Assume same as for H2 (g) fill compressor station.,-
42
-
HVAC overhead,investment,2030,400,EUR/MW/km,2011,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",
42
+
HVAC overhead,investment,2030,500,EUR/MW/km,2011,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",
43
43
HVAC overhead,lifetime,2030,40,years,2011,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",
44
44
HVAC overhead,FOM,2030,2,%/year,2011,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",
45
-
HVDC overhead,investment,2030,400,EUR/MW/km,2011,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",
45
+
HVDC overhead,investment,2030,500,EUR/MW/km,2011,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",
46
46
HVDC overhead,lifetime,2030,40,years,2011,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",
47
47
HVDC overhead,FOM,2030,2,%/year,2011,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",
48
-
HVDC submarine,investment,2030,970,EUR/MW/km,2017,Härtel et al. (2017): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.008 .,Table 1
48
+
HVDC submarine,investment,2030,1200,EUR/MW/km,2017,Härtel et al. (2017): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.008 .,Table 1
49
49
HVDC submarine,FOM,2030,0.35,%/year,2018,Purvins et al. (2018): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.095 .,"Based on estimated costs for a NA-EU connector (bidirectional,4 GW, 3000km length and ca. 3000m depth). Costs in return based on existing/currently under construction undersea cables."
50
50
HVDC submarine,lifetime,2030,40,years,2018,Purvins et al. (2018): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.095 .,"Based on estimated costs for a NA-EU connector (bidirectional,4 GW, 3000km length and ca. 3000m depth). Costs in return based on existing/currently under construction undersea cables."
51
-
HVDC underground,investment,2030,970,EUR/MW/km,2017,Härtel et al. (2017): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.008 .,Table 1 (same as for HVDC submarine)
51
+
HVDC underground,investment,2030,1200,EUR/MW/km,2017,Härtel et al. (2017): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.008 .,Table 1 (same as for HVDC submarine)
52
52
HVDC underground,FOM,2030,0.35,%/year,2018,Purvins et al. (2018): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.095 .,"Based on estimated costs for a NA-EU connector (bidirectional,4 GW, 3000km length and ca. 3000m depth). Costs in return based on existing/currently under construction undersea cables. (same as for HVDC submarine)"
53
53
HVDC underground,lifetime,2030,40,years,2018,Purvins et al. (2018): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.095 .,"Based on estimated costs for a NA-EU connector (bidirectional,4 GW, 3000km length and ca. 3000m depth). Costs in return based on existing/currently under construction undersea cables. (same as for HVDC submarine)"
@@ -320,8 +320,8 @@ electric arc furnace,FOM,2020,30,%/year,2020,"Model assumptions from MPP Steel T
320
320
electric arc furnace,lifetime,2020,40,years,2020,"Model assumptions from MPP Steel Transition Tool: https://github.com/missionpossiblepartnership/mpp-steel-model/blob/9eca52db92bd2d9715f30e98ccaaf36677fdb516/mppsteel/data/import_data/CAPEX%20OPEX%20Per%20Technology.xlsx, accessed: 2022-12-05.",MPP steel model distinguishes between plant lifetime (40 years) and investment cycle (20 years). Choose plant lifetime.
321
321
electric arc furnace,electricity-input,2020,0.6395,MWh_el/t_steel,2020,"Mission Possible Partnership (2022): Steel Model (https://github.com/missionpossiblepartnership/mpp-steel-model/blob/9eca52db92bd2d9715f30e98ccaaf36677fdb516/mppsteel/data/import_data/Technology%20Business%20Cases.csv, accessed: 2022-12-03).",Based on process ‘EAF’.
322
322
electric arc furnace,hbi-input,2020,1,t_hbi/t_steel,2020,-,Assume HBI instead of scrap as input.Scrap would require higher input (in tonnes) as steel content is lower.
323
-
shipping fuel methanol,fuel,2020,72,EUR/MWh_th,2020,"Based on (source 1) Hampp et al (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.01092, and (source 2): https://www.methanol.org/methanol-price-supply-demand/; both accessed: 2022-12-03.",400 EUR/t assuming range roughly in the long-term range for green methanol (source 1) and late 2020+beyond values for grey methanol (source 2).
324
-
shipping fuel methanol,CO2 intensity,2020,0.2482,t_CO2/MWh_th,2020,-,Based on stochiometric composition.
323
+
shipping fuel methanol,fuel,2040,100,EUR/MWh_th,2020,"Based on https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03927",
324
+
shipping fuel methanol,CO2 intensity,2040,0,t_CO2/MWh_th,2020,-,Based on stochiometric composition. Assuming green methanol.
325
325
iron ore DRI-ready,commodity,2020,97.73,EUR/t,2020,"Model assumptions from MPP Steel Transition Tool: https://missionpossiblepartnership.org/action-sectors/steel/, accessed: 2022-12-03.","DRI ready assumes 65% iron content, requiring no additional benefication."
@@ -362,11 +362,11 @@ geothermal,lifetime,2020,30,years,2020,"Aghahosseini, Breyer 2020: From hot rock
362
362
geothermal,district heat-input,2020,0.8,MWh_thdh/MWh_th,2020,"Aghahosseini, Breyer 2020: From hot rock to useful energy: A global estimate of enhanced geothermal systems potential, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920312551; Breede et al. 2015: Overcoming challenges in the classification of deep geothermal potential, https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/169585/","Heat-input, District Heat-output. This is an assessment of typical heat losses when heat is transmitted from the EGS plant to the DH network, This is a rough estimate, depends on local conditions"
363
363
geothermal,FOM,2020,2,%/year,2020,"Aghahosseini, Breyer 2020: From hot rock to useful energy: A global estimate of enhanced geothermal systems potential, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920312551",See Supplemental Material of source for details
364
364
geothermal,district heat surcharge,2020,25,%,2020,Frey et al. 2022: Techno-Economic Assessment of Geothermal Resources in the Variscan Basement of the Northern Upper Rhine Graben,"If capital cost of electric generation from EGS is 100%, district heating adds additional 25%. Costs incurred by piping."
bioethanol crops,fuel,2020,54.6434100368518,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg for MINBIOCRP11 (Bioethanol barley, wheat, grain maize, oats, other cereals and rye), ENS_BaU_GFTM",
371
371
bioethanol crops,fuel,2030,72.477665790641,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg for MINBIOCRP11 (Bioethanol barley, wheat, grain maize, oats, other cereals and rye), ENS_BaU_GFTM",
372
372
bioethanol crops,fuel,2040,75.7178710725453,EUR/MWhth,2010,"JRC ENSPRESO ca avg for MINBIOCRP11 (Bioethanol barley, wheat, grain maize, oats, other cereals and rye), ENS_BaU_GFTM",
HVDC overhead,FOM,2.0,%/year,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",,2011.0
300
-
HVDC overhead,investment,442.1414,EUR/MW/km,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",,2011.0
300
+
HVDC overhead,investment,552.6768,EUR/MW/km,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",,2011.0
301
301
HVDC overhead,lifetime,40.0,years,"Hagspiel et al. (2014): doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.025 , table A.2 .",,2011.0
302
302
HVDC submarine,FOM,0.35,%/year,Purvins et al. (2018): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.095 .,"Based on estimated costs for a NA-EU connector (bidirectional,4 GW, 3000km length and ca. 3000m depth). Costs in return based on existing/currently under construction undersea cables.",2018.0
303
-
HVDC submarine,investment,1008.2934,EUR/MW/km,Härtel et al. (2017): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.008 .,Table 1,2017.0
303
+
HVDC submarine,investment,1247.3733,EUR/MW/km,Härtel et al. (2017): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.008 .,Table 1,2017.0
304
304
HVDC submarine,lifetime,40.0,years,Purvins et al. (2018): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.095 .,"Based on estimated costs for a NA-EU connector (bidirectional,4 GW, 3000km length and ca. 3000m depth). Costs in return based on existing/currently under construction undersea cables.",2018.0
305
305
HVDC underground,FOM,0.35,%/year,Purvins et al. (2018): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.095 .,"Based on estimated costs for a NA-EU connector (bidirectional,4 GW, 3000km length and ca. 3000m depth). Costs in return based on existing/currently under construction undersea cables. (same as for HVDC submarine)",2018.0
306
-
HVDC underground,investment,1008.2934,EUR/MW/km,Härtel et al. (2017): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.008 .,Table 1 (same as for HVDC submarine),2017.0
306
+
HVDC underground,investment,1247.3733,EUR/MW/km,Härtel et al. (2017): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2017.06.008 .,Table 1 (same as for HVDC submarine),2017.0
307
307
HVDC underground,lifetime,40.0,years,Purvins et al. (2018): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.095 .,"Based on estimated costs for a NA-EU connector (bidirectional,4 GW, 3000km length and ca. 3000m depth). Costs in return based on existing/currently under construction undersea cables. (same as for HVDC submarine)",2018.0
308
308
Haber-Bosch,FOM,3.0,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",103 Hydrogen to Ammonia: Fixed O&M,2015.0
309
309
Haber-Bosch,VOM,0.0225,EUR/MWh_NH3,"Danish Energy Agency, data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",103 Hydrogen to Ammonia: Variable O&M,2015.0
@@ -842,7 +842,7 @@ electrobiofuels,investment,559887.2932,EUR/kW_th,combination of BtL and electrof
842
842
electrolysis,FOM,4.0,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",86 AEC 100 MW: Fixed O&M ,2020.0
843
843
electrolysis,efficiency,0.5773,per unit,"Danish Energy Agency, data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",86 AEC 100 MW: Hydrogen Output,2020.0
844
844
electrolysis,efficiency-heat,0.2762,per unit,"Danish Energy Agency, data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",86 AEC 100 MW: - hereof recoverable for district heating,2020.0
electrolysis,lifetime,25.0,years,"Danish Energy Agency, data_sheets_for_renewable_fuels.xlsx",86 AEC 100 MW: Technical lifetime,2020.0
847
847
fuel cell,FOM,5.0,%/year,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_for_el_and_dh.xlsx",12 LT-PEMFC CHP: Fixed O&M,2015.0
848
848
fuel cell,c_b,1.25,50oC/100oC,"Danish Energy Agency, technology_data_for_el_and_dh.xlsx",12 LT-PEMFC CHP: Cb coefficient,2015.0
@@ -996,8 +996,8 @@ seawater desalination,FOM,4.0,%/year,"Caldera et al 2016: Local cost of seawater
996
996
seawater desalination,electricity-input,3.0348,kWh/m^3-H2O,"Caldera et al 2016: Local cost of seawater RO desalination based on solar PV and windenergy: A global estimate. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.004), Fig. 4.",,
997
997
seawater desalination,investment,42561.4413,EUR/(m^3-H2O/h),"Caldera et al 2017: Learning Curve for Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plants: Capital Cost Trend of the Past, Present, and Future (https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021402), Table 4.",,2015.0
998
998
seawater desalination,lifetime,30.0,years,"Caldera et al 2016: Local cost of seawater RO desalination based on solar PV and windenergy: A global estimate. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.004), Table 1.",,
999
-
shipping fuel methanol,CO2 intensity,0.2482,tCO2/MWh_th,-,Based on stochiometric composition.,2020.0
1000
-
shipping fuel methanol,fuel,72.0,EUR/MWh_th,"Based on (source 1) Hampp et al (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.01092, and (source 2): https://www.methanol.org/methanol-price-supply-demand/; both accessed: 2022-12-03.",400 EUR/t assuming range roughly in the long-term range for green methanol (source 1) and late 2020+beyond values for grey methanol (source 2).,2020.0
999
+
shipping fuel methanol,CO2 intensity,0.0,tCO2/MWh_th,-,Based on stochiometric composition. Assuming green methanol.,2020.0
1000
+
shipping fuel methanol,fuel,100.0,EUR/MWh_th,Based on https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.03927,,2020.0
1001
1001
solar,FOM,1.578,%/year,Calculated. See 'further description'.,Mixed investment costs based on average of 50% 'solar-rooftop' and 50% 'solar-utility',2020.0
1002
1002
solar,VOM,0.0106,EUR/MWhel,RES costs made up to fix curtailment order, from old pypsa cost assumptions,2015.0
1003
1003
solar,investment,809.8118,EUR/kW_e,Calculated. See 'further description'.,Mixed investment costs based on average of 50% 'solar-rooftop' and 50% 'solar-utility',2020.0
0 commit comments