-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Open
Labels
cosmetic issueIssues in plots or output in general, not real bugs but it looks nicer if changedIssues in plots or output in general, not real bugs but it looks nicer if changedenhancementImprovements or expansions in behaviour of existing featuresImprovements or expansions in behaviour of existing features
Milestone
Description
There are two issues with the plot returned by calc_CentralDose()

- For small plot sizes, the text is not aligned well
- Depending on the data, the y-axis does not scale well. In the example screenshot a "log likelihood" of -1500 mathematically not reasonable and the starting part of the graph does not contain useful information. Even exp(-100) = 3.720076e-44. A more reasonable scaling would be for example 1 to 100 with the axis label "likelihood [%]". Or the scaling depends on the likelihood limits.
By the way: It might be more reasonable to return a radial plot (plot_RadialPlot()) as this is the type of plot which was also used in the original publication for the CAM method Galbraith et al. (1999).
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
cosmetic issueIssues in plots or output in general, not real bugs but it looks nicer if changedIssues in plots or output in general, not real bugs but it looks nicer if changedenhancementImprovements or expansions in behaviour of existing featuresImprovements or expansions in behaviour of existing features