|
| 1 | +# Rampage L1 Tokenomics |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +> **RPM Token Economics and Distribution Model** |
| 4 | +
|
| 5 | +--- |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Token Overview |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +| Parameter | Value | |
| 10 | +|-----------|-------| |
| 11 | +| **Token Name** | RPM | |
| 12 | +| **Base Denomination** | urpm (1 RPM = 1,000,000 urpm) | |
| 13 | +| **Chain** | Rampage L1 (Sovereign Cosmos SDK Chain) | |
| 14 | +| **Consensus** | CometBFT (Delegated Proof-of-Stake) | |
| 15 | +| **Initial Supply** | Defined at genesis | |
| 16 | +| **Inflation Model** | Dynamic, bounded | |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +--- |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## Token Utility |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +The RPM token serves multiple critical functions within the Rampage L1 ecosystem: |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +### 1. Network Security (Staking) |
| 25 | +- Validators and delegators stake RPM to secure the network |
| 26 | +- Staked RPM earns block rewards and a share of transaction fees |
| 27 | +- Staking creates economic alignment between validators and network health |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +### 2. Governance |
| 30 | +- RPM holders participate in on-chain governance through the `x/governor` module |
| 31 | +- Voting power is proportional to staked RPM |
| 32 | +- Governance proposals include parameter changes, treasury allocation, and protocol upgrades |
| 33 | +- Constitutional constraints prevent governance attacks on core protocol parameters |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +### 3. Transaction Fees |
| 36 | +- All transactions on Rampage L1 require RPM for gas fees |
| 37 | +- Minimum gas price is enforced by validators |
| 38 | +- Fee revenue is distributed to validators and delegators |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +### 4. Truth Attestation |
| 41 | +- RPM is required to submit and stake on truth attestations |
| 42 | +- Economic incentives align attestors with accuracy |
| 43 | +- Slashing penalties for false attestation protect data integrity |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +--- |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +## Inflation Model |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +Rampage L1 uses a dynamic inflation model similar to the Cosmos Hub, with bounded parameters: |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +| Parameter | Value | |
| 52 | +|-----------|-------| |
| 53 | +| **Inflation Min** | 7% | |
| 54 | +| **Inflation Max** | 20% | |
| 55 | +| **Inflation Rate Change** | 13% per year | |
| 56 | +| **Bonded Target** | 67% | |
| 57 | +| **Block Reward Distribution** | Proportional to stake | |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +### How It Works |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +- When the bonded ratio (staked tokens / total supply) falls below 67%, inflation increases to incentivize staking |
| 62 | +- When the bonded ratio exceeds 67%, inflation decreases |
| 63 | +- This creates a self-regulating economic mechanism that targets network security |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +--- |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +## Staking Economics |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +### Validator Rewards |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +Validators earn rewards from two sources: |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +1. **Block Rewards:** New RPM minted per block, distributed proportionally to stake weight |
| 74 | +2. **Transaction Fees:** All gas fees collected in each block |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +### Commission |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +Validators set a commission rate on rewards earned by their delegators: |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +| Parameter | Constraint | |
| 81 | +|-----------|------------| |
| 82 | +| Initial Commission | Set by validator (0-100%) | |
| 83 | +| Max Commission | Set at validator creation (immutable ceiling) | |
| 84 | +| Max Commission Change Rate | Maximum daily commission increase | |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +### Delegator Returns |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +Delegators receive staking rewards minus the validator's commission: |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +``` |
| 91 | +Delegator Reward = (Delegator Stake / Validator Total Stake) * Block Rewards * (1 - Commission Rate) |
| 92 | +``` |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +--- |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +## Slashing |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +Slashing protects the network by penalizing malicious or negligent validators: |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +| Violation | Penalty | Jail Duration | |
| 101 | +|-----------|---------|---------------| |
| 102 | +| **Double Signing** | 5% of staked RPM | Permanent (tombstoned) | |
| 103 | +| **Downtime** (missing >95% of blocks in window) | 0.01% of staked RPM | 10 minutes | |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +### Slashing Impact |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +- Slashed tokens are burned (removed from supply) |
| 108 | +- Delegators staked with a slashed validator also lose proportional stake |
| 109 | +- Double signing results in permanent removal from the validator set |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +--- |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +## Unbonding |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +| Parameter | Value | |
| 116 | +|-----------|-------| |
| 117 | +| **Unbonding Period** | 21 days | |
| 118 | +| **Redelegation** | Instant (with cooldown) | |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +During the unbonding period: |
| 121 | +- Tokens do not earn rewards |
| 122 | +- Tokens are still subject to slashing |
| 123 | +- After 21 days, tokens become liquid and transferable |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +--- |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +## Governance Economics |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +### Proposal Deposits |
| 130 | + |
| 131 | +- Governance proposals require a minimum RPM deposit |
| 132 | +- Deposits are returned if the proposal passes or fails to reach quorum |
| 133 | +- Deposits are burned if the proposal is vetoed (>33% NoWithVeto) |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +### Voting Parameters |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +| Parameter | Value | |
| 138 | +|-----------|-------| |
| 139 | +| Voting Period | 14 days | |
| 140 | +| Quorum | 33.4% of bonded stake | |
| 141 | +| Threshold | 50% Yes votes | |
| 142 | +| Veto Threshold | 33.4% NoWithVeto | |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +### Constitutional Constraints |
| 145 | + |
| 146 | +The `x/governor` module enforces constitutional constraints on governance: |
| 147 | +- Certain parameters cannot be modified via governance (protocol constants) |
| 148 | +- Emergency proposals have shorter voting periods but higher quorum requirements |
| 149 | +- Validator weight decay for non-participating validators |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +--- |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | +## Fee Structure |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +### Gas Pricing |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +| Parameter | Value | |
| 158 | +|-----------|-------| |
| 159 | +| Minimum Gas Price | 0.001 urpm | |
| 160 | +| Gas Limit Per Block | Configurable | |
| 161 | +| Fee Burn Rate | 0% (all fees to validators) | |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +### Fee Distribution |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +- Block proposer receives a bonus share of fees |
| 166 | +- Remaining fees are distributed proportionally to all bonded validators |
| 167 | +- Community pool receives a configurable percentage |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +--- |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +## Community Pool |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | +A percentage of all block rewards and fees is directed to the community pool: |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +- Controlled by governance proposals |
| 176 | +- Used for ecosystem development, grants, and infrastructure |
| 177 | +- Cannot be spent without an approved governance proposal |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +--- |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +## Token Distribution (Genesis) |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +The genesis token allocation will be published prior to mainnet launch. The distribution is designed to: |
| 184 | + |
| 185 | +- Ensure sufficient decentralization of the validator set |
| 186 | +- Fund core development and ecosystem growth |
| 187 | +- Incentivize early validators and testnet participants |
| 188 | +- Establish a community pool for ongoing development |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | +Detailed allocation percentages will be included in the genesis ceremony documentation. |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | +--- |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +## Economic Security Model |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +Rampage L1's economic security is derived from: |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | +1. **Stake-weighted consensus:** The cost of attacking the network is proportional to the value of staked RPM |
| 199 | +2. **Slashing penalties:** Malicious behavior results in permanent economic loss |
| 200 | +3. **Unbonding period:** Prevents rapid destabilization of the validator set |
| 201 | +4. **Constitutional governance:** Prevents economic parameter manipulation through governance attacks |
| 202 | +5. **Dynamic inflation:** Self-regulating mechanism to maintain target security ratio |
| 203 | + |
| 204 | +--- |
| 205 | + |
| 206 | +> **Disclaimer:** Tokenomics parameters are subject to change through governance. Values listed reflect the initial configuration and may be modified via approved governance proposals, subject to constitutional constraints. |
| 207 | +
|
| 208 | +--- |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +*Copyright 2025 Shea Patrick Kastl. Rampage L1 tokenomics are proprietary design elements protected under the NOTICE file. See [NOTICE](../NOTICE) for details.* |
0 commit comments