Skip to content

Potential reviewers #27

Description

@rougier

@rougier, @khinsen, @otizonaizit, @pdebuyl, @ctb, @ThomasA, @tpoisot, @benoit-girard, @karthik, @oliviaguest, @labarba, @benoit-girard, @MehdiKhamassi, @vitay, @gdetor, @dmcglinn, @yoavram, @FedericoV, @heplesser, @apdavison, @neuronalX, @piero-le-fou, @mstimberg, @rossant, @eroesch, @damiendr, @delsuc, @soolijoo, @benureau, @rth, @KamilSJaron, @almarklein, @pietromarchesi, @anyaevostinar, @ozancaglayan, @aaronshifman, @gviejo, @gdetor, @MehdiKhamassi, @benoit-girard, @opetchey, @Vahidrostami, @jsta, @Fjanks, @ChristophMetzner, @vitay, @akdiem, @falex33, @aaronshifman, @RafaelNH

Whatever the journal we choose, we'll certainly have to propose several names for the review. Given the high number of authors (50), we might have a lot of conflict of interests. Please propose name below (one per post) and if anybody has a conflict of interest, just add a thumb down.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions