Replies: 3 comments
-
@Blesh as far as I remember, it stops emitting, but doesn't tear down the Observable, so not quite what you have there. @jhusain am I correct here? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Keeps emitting, doesn't tear down Observable. The forEach method however
continues to work the way subscribe works today.
…On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Matthew Podwysocki ***@***.*** > wrote:
@Blesh <https://github.com/blesh> as far as I remember, it stops
emitting, but doesn't tear down the Observable, so not quite what you have
there. @jhusain <https://github.com/jhusain> am I correct here?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2167 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAcfr_U6HXExbNmlw_FMSOZv9WbWGDcnks5rD5dfgaJpZM4LCATi>
.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I think we're going to have to target this for v7. It's an important change, but it will incur a lot of breakage in the community I think. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This is coming from the TC39 proposal (cc @jhusain)
Basically, to match the behavior of EventTarget, an error in the handler shouldn't cause the source to stop emitting values. In other words:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions