Fix improper checking for SVML

Signed-off-by: Ian <[email protected]>

Author: Rinzii

include/ccmath/internal/math/runtime/simd/func/impl/sse2/pow.hpp

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ namespace ccm::intrin
 	{
 		// The cmake performs a test validating if the compiler supports SVML.
 		// As far as I'm aware, this is the only reliable way to check.
-		#if CCMATH_HAS_SIMD_SVML
+		#ifdef CCMATH_HAS_SIMD_SVML
 		return { _mm_pow_ps(a.get(), b.get()) };
 		#else
 		// TODO: Replace this with a refined solution. For the time being this is temporary.
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ namespace ccm::intrin
 	{
 		// The cmake performs a test validating if the compiler supports SVML.
 		// As far as I'm aware, this is the only reliable way to check.
-		#if CCMATH_HAS_SIMD_SVML
+		#ifdef CCMATH_HAS_SIMD_SVML
 		return { _mm_pow_pd(a.get(), b.get()) };
 		#else
 		// TODO: Replace this with a refined solution. For the time being this is temporary.

include/ccmath/internal/math/runtime/simd/func/impl/sse4/pow.hpp

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ namespace ccm::intrin
 	{
 		// The cmake performs a test validating if the compiler supports SVML.
 		// As far as I'm aware, this is the only reliable way to check.
-		#if CCMATH_HAS_SIMD_SVML
+		#ifdef CCMATH_HAS_SIMD_SVML
 		return { _mm_pow_ps(a.get(), b.get()) };
 		#else
 		// TODO: Replace this with a refined solution. For the time being this is temporary.
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ namespace ccm::intrin
 	{
 		// The cmake performs a test validating if the compiler supports SVML.
 		// As far as I'm aware, this is the only reliable way to check.
-		#if defined(CCMATH_HAS_SIMD_SVML)
+		#ifdef CCMATH_HAS_SIMD_SVML
 		return { _mm_pow_pd(a.get(), b.get()) };
 		#else
 		// TODO: Replace this with a refined solution. For the time being this is temporary.