The last line of test_c14n.pl is missing a comma (plus ... is plunit underreporting?)

[dtonhofer]

test('3.2.4.2.3 Test case c14n11/xmlbase-c14n11spec-102', [blocked('Cannot express [self::a or ancestor-or-self::d] using builtin xpath')]):-
        c14n_test('testdata/xmlbase-c14n11spec3-input.xml', unknown 'xmlbase-c14n11spec3-102.output').

There should be one after unknown.

Not so bad, you say. Especially as the test is marked "blocked".

However, running the SWI-Prolog test suite does not generate an error here (100% tests passed), although the LastTest.log indeed says:

ERROR: swipl-devel_original/packages/sgml/test_c14n.pl:196:67: Syntax error: Operator expected

(The weirdest thing is that I can't remember seeing this error in the log before ... maybe I'm just getting old).

Additionally, we have the follwoing in the log:

% PL-Unit: c14n ....
ERROR: SGML2PL(xmlns): swipl-devel_original/packages/sgml/testdata/xmlspace-input.xml:4: xml:space-mode "true" does not exist
.
ERROR: SGML2PL(xmlns): swipl-devel_original/packages/sgml/testdata/xmlspace-input.xml:4: xml:space-mode "true" does not exist
.
ERROR: SGML2PL(xmlns): swipl-devel_original/packages/sgml/testdata/xmlspace-input.xml:4: xml:space-mode "true" does not exist
.
ERROR: SGML2PL(xmlns): swipl-devel_original/packages/sgml/testdata/xmlspace-input.xml:4: xml:space-mode "true" does not exist
.......... done

In spite of that:

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 69

Should this really be reported as "100% passed"?

[JanWielemaker]

Thanks. Fixed the missing comma after unknown. @thetrime. I don't dare touching these files, but could you comment on "xml:space="true"? Is this really intended? It seems not part of the XML standard, but it is not clear that an XML processor should complain on unknown values for this attribute.