Skip to content

Commit 9b9eb8e

Browse files
authored
add coding guidelines meeting notes for 2026-04-22 (#635)
1 parent 7cad901 commit 9b9eb8e

1 file changed

Lines changed: 88 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

  • subcommittee/coding-guidelines/meetings/2026-04-22
Lines changed: 88 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
1+
# **Coding Guidelines Subcommittee Meeting on 2026-04-22 @ 1600 CEST / 1100 EDT**
2+
3+
[Link](https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1&lid=5,12,2643743,8,1850147,100,14&h=5&date=2026-4-22&sln=11-12&hf=1) to meeting time in common time zones.
4+
5+
| Search Key | Description |
6+
| :---- | :---- |
7+
| \[todo\] | Action Item |
8+
| \[decision\] | Something decided on |
9+
| \[important\] | Key information |
10+
11+
## **Agenda**
12+
13+
1. Solicitation of notetaker
14+
2. Acceptance of [Previous Meeting Minutes](https://github.com/Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium/safety-critical-rust-consortium/blob/main/subcommittee/coding-guidelines/meetings/2026-04-15/minutes.md)
15+
3. Introduction of new members
16+
4. Review batches for [CERT C \=\> Rust Mapping](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/336) (Pete)
17+
- Félix can share updates from his side on reviewing feedback
18+
- Let's split up again, to get some feedback on batches 1 & 2
19+
- [\#427 \[CERT C Review Batch 1/5\] Review proposed Rust categorization](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/427)
20+
* [https://meet.google.com/xna-qdvi-rmk](https://meet.google.com/xna-qdvi-rmk)
21+
- [\#428 \[CERT C Review Batch 2/5\] Review proposed Rust categorization](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/428)
22+
* [https://meet.google.com/sow-whqc-iir](https://meet.google.com/sow-whqc-iir)
23+
5. Coverage of MISRA C and CERT C in 2026 (Félix / Markus updates)
24+
- MISRA C one has a [PR up](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/pull/432) from Markus
25+
6. Interest in the MISRA C++ mapping
26+
- Please register interest on [this Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/579369-safety-critical-consortium.2Fcoding-guidelines/topic/MISRA.20C.2B.2B.20Mapping.20Interest/with/584764785)
27+
- Pete/Alex/Joel are working out how we can have some kind of copy of the MISRA documents (C, C++) held in the jurisdiction of the Rust Foundation in support of members to be able to work on coding guidelines
28+
7. Overview of [Safety-Critical Rust](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/roadmap-safety-critical-rust.html) \- Rust Project Goals Roadmap (Pete)
29+
- Soliciting those interested in [Establish a Spot for Safety-Critical Lints in Clippy](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/safety-critical-lints-in-clippy.html) goal
30+
* Register interest [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/445688-safety-critical-consortium/topic/Getting.20involved.20with.20Clippy.20for.20SCRC.20lints/with/583090116) on Rust Zulip
31+
- Soliciting those interested in [Normative Documentation for Sound unsafe Rust](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/safe-unsafe-for-safety-critical.html) goal
32+
* Register interest [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/445688-safety-critical-consortium/topic/SCRC.20.3C.3D.3E.20t-opsem.3A.20Normative.20Documentation.20for.20Sound.20.60unsafe.60/with/586198564) on Rust Zulip
33+
8. Proposals and ideas for new rules (all)
34+
9. Progress on ongoing tasks (all)
35+
10. Round table
36+
37+
## **Check-in area**
38+
39+
**Please add your name, and an emoji that describes your day.**
40+
41+
* Markus Hosch
42+
* Oreste Bernardi🏥
43+
* Arshad Mahmood 🌞
44+
* Andreas Weis ☀️
45+
* Max Jacinto 👾
46+
* William Barsse
47+
* Christof Petig 🌞
48+
49+
**Notetaker:**
50+
51+
* Markus Hosch
52+
53+
For tips on how we take notes in the Safety-Critical Rust Consortium, please see the [Meeting Notetaker Role](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-consortium/blob/main/docs/notetaker-role.md) doc.
54+
55+
## **Housekeeping section**
56+
57+
* Document space: [coding-guidelines](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-consortium/tree/main/subcommittee/coding-guidelines)
58+
* Zulip: [safety-critical-consortium: Coding Guidelines](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/445688-safety-critical-consortium/topic/Coding.20Guidelines)
59+
* [Kanban board](https://github.com/orgs/rustfoundation/projects/1/views/3)
60+
* [`contributor experience`](https://github.com/orgs/rustfoundation/projects/1/views/4) view
61+
* [`coding guideline`](https://github.com/orgs/rustfoundation/projects/1/views/5) view
62+
63+
## **Tasks**
64+
65+
* Markus to also review [https://github.com/Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/430](https://github.com/Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/430)
66+
* Oreste will create an issue on the operator precedence issue
67+
68+
## **Meeting Minutes**
69+
70+
* Previous meeting minutes accepted
71+
* Looking at [https://github.com/Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/336](https://github.com/Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/336), this has been split into 5 subissues, see [https://github.com/Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/336\#issuecomment-4040940602](https://github.com/Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/336#issuecomment-4040940602)
72+
* [https://github.com/Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/pull/432](https://github.com/Safety-Critical-Rust-Consortium/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/pull/432) will be merged by 04/25/26 if there are no more comments.
73+
* Pointed to the thread and asked for interest
74+
* [https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/safe-unsafe-for-safety-critical.html](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/safe-unsafe-for-safety-critical.html): Unsafe is not documented well enough; goal is to look at the “dark corners” and shed some light; Iceoryx2 is used as an example.
75+
* Q: How can you “define” undefined behavior? The spec sometimes does not say *anything* about a specific part of the language, so it is unknown whether it will (at some point) be sound or not
76+
* Last FAQ point gets debated, wording seems unclear. The intent is to describe what preconditions sound code has; it is not intended to define things that are UB today.
77+
* New rules
78+
* MISRA C rule “follow contracts” could that lead to a rule “use typestate”?
79+
1. Maybe too strict. The rule should be more open to also allow other ways
80+
2. Rule not very useful as it cannot be checked / enforced.
81+
3. Might be useful as an implementation pattern to help enforce more high level rules or other rules
82+
* Operator precedence change in the face of generics
83+
1. Evaluation order changes depending on whether the left hand side of the add\_assign operator is generic or not.
84+
* No topics for the round table
85+
86+
## **Material**
87+
88+
Any material to read before the meeting should be included here.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)