Skip to content

Commit c21bf66

Browse files
add coding guidelines meeting minutes for 2026-05-01 (#639)
1 parent 2713ebb commit c21bf66

1 file changed

Lines changed: 109 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

  • subcommittee/coding-guidelines/meetings/2026-05-01
Lines changed: 109 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
1+
# **Coding Guidelines Subcommittee Meeting on 2026-05-01 @ 0800 JST / 1900 EDT**
2+
3+
[Link](https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1&lid=5,12,2643743,8,1850147,100,14,14&h=5&date=2026-4-30&sln=19-20&hf=1) to meeting time in common time zones.
4+
5+
| Search Key | Description |
6+
| :------------ | :------------------- |
7+
| \[todo\] | Action Item |
8+
| \[decision\] | Something decided on |
9+
| \[important\] | Key information |
10+
11+
## **Agenda**
12+
13+
1. Solicitation of notetaker
14+
2. Acceptance of Previous Meeting Minutes
15+
3. Introduction of new members
16+
4. Review batches for [CERT C \=\> Rust Mapping](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/336) (Pete)
17+
- Let's split up again, to get some feedback on batches 1 & 2
18+
- [\#427 \[CERT C Review Batch 1/5\] Review proposed Rust categorization](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/427)
19+
- [\#428 \[CERT C Review Batch 2/5\] Review proposed Rust categorization](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/issues/428)
20+
5. Coverage of MISRA C and CERT C in 2026 (Félix / Markus updates)
21+
- MISRA C one has a [PR up](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-coding-guidelines/pull/432) from Markus
22+
6. Interest in the MISRA C++ mapping
23+
- Please register interest on [this Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/579369-safety-critical-consortium.2Fcoding-guidelines/topic/MISRA.20C.2B.2B.20Mapping.20Interest/with/584764785)
24+
- Pete/Alex are working out how we can have some kind of copy of the MISRA documents (C, C++) held in the jurisdiction of the Rust Foundation in support of members to be able to work on coding guidelines
25+
7. Overview of [Safety-Critical Rust](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/roadmap-safety-critical-rust.html) \- Rust Project Goals Roadmap (Pete)
26+
- Soliciting those interested in [Establish a Spot for Safety-Critical Lints in Clippy](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/safety-critical-lints-in-clippy.html) goal
27+
- Register interest [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/445688-safety-critical-consortium/topic/Getting.20involved.20with.20Clippy.20for.20SCRC.20lints/with/583090116) on Rust Zulip
28+
- Soliciting those interested in [Normative Documentation for Sound unsafe Rust](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/safe-unsafe-for-safety-critical.html) goal
29+
- Register interest [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/445688-safety-critical-consortium/topic/SCRC.20.3C.3D.3E.20t-opsem.3A.20Normative.20Documentation.20for.20Sound.20.60unsafe.60/with/586198564) on Rust Zulip
30+
8. Proposals and ideas for new rules (all)
31+
9. Progress on ongoing tasks (all)
32+
10. Round table
33+
34+
## **Check-in area**
35+
36+
**Please add your name, and an emoji that describes your day.**
37+
38+
- Mikhail Antoshkin ☕
39+
- Max Jacinto 🍜
40+
- Pete LeVasseur 🖖
41+
- Yuchen Shen ☕
42+
43+
**Notetaker:**
44+
45+
- Mikhail Antoshkin
46+
47+
For tips on how we take notes in the Safety-Critical Rust Consortium, please see the [Meeting Notetaker Role](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-consortium/blob/main/docs/notetaker-role.md) doc.
48+
49+
## **Housekeeping section**
50+
51+
- Document space: [coding-guidelines](https://github.com/rustfoundation/safety-critical-rust-consortium/tree/main/subcommittee/coding-guidelines)
52+
- Zulip: [safety-critical-consortium: Coding Guidelines](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/445688-safety-critical-consortium/topic/Coding.20Guidelines)
53+
- [Kanban board](https://github.com/orgs/rustfoundation/projects/1/views/3)
54+
- [`contributor experience`](https://github.com/orgs/rustfoundation/projects/1/views/4) view
55+
- [`coding guideline`](https://github.com/orgs/rustfoundation/projects/1/views/5) view
56+
57+
## **Tasks**
58+
59+
- None
60+
61+
## **Meeting Minutes**
62+
63+
- Agenda discussion
64+
- Coverage of MISRA C and CERT C and mapping to Rust
65+
- MISRA C++
66+
- Lacking copies of MISRA C/C++ for consortium members, trying to procure
67+
- Roadmap
68+
- If you are interested in working on clippy lints - register your interest on Zulip, though time slot might be not the most comfortable for APAC
69+
- [Normative Documentation for Sound unsafe Rust](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-project-goals/2026/safe-unsafe-for-safety-critical.html) goal
70+
1. Same as clippy, if you are interested - register on Zulip
71+
1. Doing what was done for zerocopy for [iceoryx2](https://github.com/eclipse-iceoryx/iceoryx2), extracting the unsafe usage patterns
72+
- Working on batch 1 of mapping CERT C rules
73+
- CERT C website had some issues, members were not able to access it
74+
- ENV34
75+
- Does not map to _safe_ Rust, but falls under “don’t break safety contract of an unsafe function”
76+
- CON37
77+
- Agreed, not in std
78+
- MSC30
79+
- Agreed, not in std
80+
- FLP37
81+
- It maps to rust, let’s have a guideline that prohibits this
82+
- [https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.f64.html#method.to_bits](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.f64.html#method.to_bits)
83+
- STR31
84+
- CStr is null-terminated [https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ffi/struct.CStr.html](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ffi/struct.CStr.html)
85+
- The string types interfaces are preventing you from breaking the rule though, needs more investigation
86+
- DCL40
87+
- Agreed, compiler is checking this
88+
- The only time it can come up is C FFI, but it’s, as wth ENV34, safety contracts
89+
- DCL39
90+
- Agreed, but needs more investigation
91+
- INT36
92+
- [https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ptr/index.html#using-strict-provenance](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ptr/index.html#using-strict-provenance) maybe we can work in strict provenance into this guideline
93+
- CON40
94+
- Agreed, we should have a guideline to point people to use APIs on atomics
95+
- CON36
96+
- Agreed, the only additional note is “spuriously” is a load-bearing word here, since some logic might require wake up even if condition still does not hold
97+
- EXP40
98+
- Agreed, but let’s move it from “maybe” to a becoming a rule about statics, since it’s not about const for rust
99+
- Probably maps directly to Unsafe Rust
100+
- STR30
101+
- Agreed, but let’s move it from “maybe” to a becoming a rule about statics, since it’s not about const for rust
102+
- Probably maps directly to Unsafe Rust
103+
- EXP39: Agreed; worth checking out the Safe Transmute Project as mentioned
104+
- CON32: Agreed; might be good to generate rules around `Send` and `Sync`
105+
- CON43: Agreed; might be good to generate rules around `Send` and `Sync`
106+
107+
## **Material**
108+
109+
Any material to read before the meeting should be included here.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)