Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
75 lines (53 loc) · 2.7 KB

File metadata and controls

75 lines (53 loc) · 2.7 KB

Contributing to Theorem of Wisdom

Thank you for taking the time to contribute! This paper is open to edits, corrections, and expansions from anyone who engages with Bayesian reasoning thoughtfully.


What Kinds of Contributions Are Welcome

Always welcome:

  • Typo and grammar fixes
  • Clarity improvements — rewording sentences that are confusing or ambiguous
  • Mathematical corrections — if a formula, calculation, or notation is wrong
  • Formatting improvements — better structure, cleaner LaTeX/Markdown

Welcome with prior discussion (open an Issue first):

  • New real-world scenarios illustrating Bayes' Theorem
  • New sections or extensions to the paper (e.g., deeper coverage of Bayesian updating)
  • Changes to the paper's core arguments or conclusions
  • Adding citations or replacing existing ones with stronger sources

Not in scope:

  • Changes that alter the paper's authorship or attribution
  • Off-topic additions unrelated to Bayesian reasoning or decision-making

How to Submit a Pull Request

  1. Fork this repository to your own GitHub account
  2. Create a branch with a descriptive name:
    git checkout -b fix/elevator-scenario-calculation
    git checkout -b add/medical-diagnosis-scenario
    
  3. Make your edits to whitepaper.md (or other files as appropriate)
  4. Commit with a clear message explaining what you changed and why:
    git commit -m "Fix: corrected P(drunk) denominator calculation in Scenario 1"
    
  5. Open a Pull Request against the main branch with:
    • A short title summarizing the change
    • A description of what you changed and why
    • If it's a math correction, show the corrected working

Opening an Issue First

For anything beyond small fixes, please open an Issue before writing a PR. This avoids duplicated effort and lets us align on whether the change fits the paper's direction.

Good issue titles:

  • Suggestion: add a medical diagnosis scenario for Section 2
  • Question: is the prior probability in elevator example sourced correctly?
  • Bug: formula in Section 2.3 appears to have a typo

Style Guidelines

  • Write in clear, accessible English, the paper is aimed at a general educated audience, not only mathematicians
  • Use LaTeX notation for all formulas (as already used throughout the paper)
  • Keep a neutral, academic tone
  • Cite sources where you introduce new factual claims

Code of Conduct

Be respectful and constructive. Disagreements about content should focus on the argument, not the person. Contributions that are dismissive or unkind will not be merged.


Questions?

Open an Issue or reach out to the author via LinkedIn.