Choosing the Right Sampling Frequency and Density for Sheath Current Acquisition #3
Shinar-of-Clark
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
1. Background
We are currently developing a Sheath Current Acquisition (SCA) unit. The primary goal is to monitor high-voltage cable metal sheaths for various damage conditions, such as insulation aging and grounding anomalies.
2. Proposed Sampling Tiers
For a 50Hz power environment, I have categorized the acquisition into three tiers for your consideration:
Tier 1: Basic
Parameters: 64 points/cycle (Sampling Rate: 1.28 kHz)
Features: Ultra-low power consumption. Focuses only on RMS trends without complex analysis.
Tier 2: Standard
Parameters: 128 points/cycle (Sampling Rate: 6.4 kHz)
Features: Balances accuracy and MCU overhead. Capable of basic FFT harmonic analysis.
Tier 3: High-Fidelity
Parameters: 256 points/cycle (Sampling Rate: 12.8 kHz)
Features: High waveform reconstruction accuracy. Ideal for transient capture and precision diagnostics.
3. My Recommendation & Concerns
My current recommendation is to use 256 points per cycle at 50Hz.
Rationale:
Data Depth: 256 points provides sufficient headroom for subsequent DSP filtering and fault diagnosis.
Memory Efficiency: 256 is a power of 2 (2^8), which ensures maximum efficiency for FFT operations and DMA buffer management on STM32 chips.
Performance Challenges: However, I am concerned that higher sampling frequencies may struggle to meet real-time processing requirements on the STM32, especially when balancing network communication and other concurrent tasks.
If you have any suggestions regarding the number of sampling points or any other technical feedback, please feel free to share. Let's discuss!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions